Seismological records indicate that seismicity in forearcs increases after large megathrust earthquakes (Dewey et al., 2007;Hasegawa et al., 2012;Lange et al., 2012). Aftershock seismicity often shows a complex spatial distribution, is highest in the first weeks after the megathrust event, and decays at a power-law like rate ("Omori's law," Parsons, 2002;Toda & Stein, 2022), as exemplified by the 11 March 2011 M w 9.0 Tohoku earthquake, Japan (Figure 1). The low forearc seismicity in the years before the earthquake focused near the plate interface and volcanic arc (Figures 1a and 1c). Seismicity immediately after the earthquake increased and spread throughout the forearc (Figures 1b and 1d). Seismicity rates were highest in the month following the Tohoku earthquake and decreased rapidly afterward (Figure 1e). The seismicity rate at the end of 2011 decreased by ∼95%, but was still higher than before the Tohoku earthquake.The increase in forearc seismicity indicates that the stress change caused by the megathrust earthquake destabilized the forearc. The exact causes and magnitude of this stress change remain uncertain, although seismological records provide important information on changes in forearc stress. Forearc seismicity after the Tohoku earthquake was dominated by normal faulting (Figure 1d), despite the thrust mechanism of the main shock and prevalence of reverse and strike-slip faulting in the decades preceding it (Hardebeck, 2012;Hasegawa et al., 2012;Yoshida et al., 2012). The normal faulting indicates that the stress state switched from deviatoric compression to deviatoric tension due to the Tohoku earthquake. The stress reversal only occurred in the offshore forearc and coastal regions near Iwaki. Reverse and strike-slip faulting continued inland Japan (Figure 1; Yoshida et al., 2019). Previous studies also inferred similar stress reversals for other megathrust earthquakes, including the 2004 M w 9.1 Sumatra and 2010 M w 8.8 Maule earthquakes (Hardebeck, 2012).