Crustal implications of bedrock geology along the Trans‐Alaska Crustal Transect (TACT) in the Brooks Range, northern Alaska

Moore, Thomas E.; Wallace, Wesley K.; Mull, Charles G.; Adams, Karen E.; Plafker, George; Nokleberg, Warren J.

doi:10.1029/96jb03733

Cited by 48 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…2). Their present conµguration is primarily the result of Mesozoic and Tertiary tectonism, but may also re×ect Paleozoic tectonic events (Moore et al, , 1997. Original facies relations, such as those between shallow-and deep-water strata, have been disrupted and obscured by widespread thrust and perhaps extensional faulting.…”

Section: Northern Alaskamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Numbers 1-12 are areas of stratigraphic sections shown in Figure 3; 13-15 are localities mentioned in text: 13, southeast Seward Peninsula; 14, northeast Ambler River Quadrangle; 15, Jones Ridge. faulted basins within the North Alaska carbonate platform during inferred middle Paleozoic extension (Moore et al, 1997), or alternatively, as Devonian and older basinal successions that formed along the southern margin of the carbonate platform .…”

Section: Northern Alaskamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Lithostratigraphic, conodont, and other faunal links between lower Paleozoic strata in northern and central Alaska and northeastern Russia

Dumoulin¹,

Harris²,

Gagiev³

et al. 2002

Tectonic Evolution of the Bering Shelf-Chukchi Sea-Artic Margin and Adjacent Landmasses

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lower Paleozoic platform carbonate strata in northern Alaska (parts of the Arctic Alaska, York, and Seward terranes; herein called the North Alaska carbonate platform) and central Alaska (Farewell terrane) share distinctive lithologic and faunal features, and may have formed on a single continental fragment situated between Siberia and Laurentia. Sedimentary successions in northern and central Alaska overlie Late Proterozoic metamorphosed basement; contain Late Proterozoic ooid-rich dolostones, Middle Cambrian outer shelf deposits, and Ordovician, Silurian, and Devonian shallow-water platform facies, and include fossils of both Siberian and Laurentian biotic provinces. The presence in the Alaskan terranes of Siberian forms not seen in wellstudied cratonal margin sequences of western Laurentia implies that the Alaskan rocks were not attached to Laurentia during the early Paleozoic.The Siberian cratonal succession includes Archean basement, Ordovician shallow-water siliciclastic rocks, and Upper Silurian-Devonian evaporites, none of which have counterparts in the Alaskan successions, and contains only a few of the Laurentian conodonts that occur in Alaska. Thus we conclude that the lower Paleozoic platform successions of northern and central Alaska were not part of the Siberian craton during their deposition, but may have formed on a crustal fragment rifted away from Siberia during the Late Proterozoic. The Alaskan strata have more similarities to coeval rocks in some peri-Siberian terranes of northeastern Russia (Kotelny, Chukotka, and Omulevka). Lithologic ties between northern Alaska, the Farewell terrane, and the peri-Siberian terranes diminish after the Middle Devonian, but Siberian afµnities in northern and central Alaskan biotas persist into the late Paleozoic. *

show abstract

Section: Northern Alaskamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Northern Alaskamentioning

confidence: 99%

Lithostratigraphic, conodont, and other faunal links between lower Paleozoic strata in northern and central Alaska and northeastern Russia

Dumoulin¹,

Harris²,

Gagiev³

et al. 2002

Tectonic Evolution of the Bering Shelf-Chukchi Sea-Artic Margin and Adjacent Landmasses

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Late CretaceousEarly Tertiary northward-vergent thrusts and folds also deformed Early Cretaceous features in northern Alaska, including apparent basement duplexing in the Brooks Range (Moore et al 1997).…”

Section: Hemispheric Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Arc and Slab-Failure Magmatism in Cordilleran Batholiths I – The Cretaceous Coastal Batholith of Peru and its Role in South American Orogenesis and Hemispheric Subduction Flip

Hildebrand¹,

Whalen

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We examined the temporal and spatial relations of rock units within the Western Cordillera of Peru where two Cretaceous basins, the Huarmey-Cañete and the West Peruvian Trough, were considered by previous workers to represent western and eastern parts respectively of the same marginal basin. The Huarmey-Cañete Trough, which sits on Mesoproterozoic basement of the Arequipa block, was filled with up to 9 km of Tithonian to Albian tholeiitic–calc-alkaline volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks. It shoaled to subaerial eastward. At 105–101 Ma the rocks were tightly folded and intruded during and just after the deformation by a suite of 103 ± 2 Ma mafic intrusions, and later in the interval 94–82 Ma by probable subduction-related plutons of the Coastal batholith. The West Peruvian Trough, which sits on Paleozoic metamorphic basement, comprised a west-facing siliciclastic-carbonate platform and adjacent basin filled with up to 5 km of sandstone, shale, marl and thinly bedded limestone deposited continuously throughout the Cretaceous. Rocks of the West Peruvian Trough were detached from their basement, folded and thrust eastward during the Late Cretaceous–Early Tertiary. Because the facies and facing directions of the two basins are incompatible, and their development and subjacent basements also distinct, the two basins could not have developed adjacent to one another. Based on thickness, composition and magmatic style, we interpret the magmatism of the Huarmey-Cañete Trough to represent a magmatic arc that shut down at about 105 Ma when the arc collided with an unknown terrane. We relate subsequent magmatism of the early 103 ± 2 Ma syntectonic mafic intrusions and dyke swarms to slab failure. The Huarmey-Cañete-Coastal batholithic block and its Mesoproterozoic basement remained offshore until 77 ± 5 Ma when it collided with, and was emplaced upon, the partially subducted western margin of South America to form the east-vergent Marañon fold–thrust belt. A major pulse of 73–62 Ma plutonism and dyke emplacement followed terminal collision and is interpreted to have been related to slab failure of the west-dipping South American lithosphere. Magmatism, 53 Ma and younger, followed terminal collision and was generated by eastward subduction of Pacific oceanic lithosphere beneath South America. Similar spatial and temporal relations exist over the length of both Americas and represent the terminal collision of an arc-bearing ribbon continent with the Americas during the Late Cretaceous–Early Tertiary Laramide event. It thus separated long-standing westward subduction from the younger period of eastward subduction characteristic of today. We speculate that the Cordilleran Ribbon Continent formed during the Mesozoic over a major zone of downwelling between Tuzo and Jason along the boundary of Panthalassic and Pacific oceanic plates.SOMMAIRENous avons étudié les relations spatiales et temporales des unités de roches dans la portion ouest de la Cordillère du Pérou, où deux bassins crétacés, la fosse d’accumulation de Huarmey-Cañete et la fosse d’accumulation péruvienne de l’ouest, ont été perçues par des auteurs précédents comme les portions ouest et est d’un même bassin de marge. La fosse de Huarmey-Cañete, qui repose sur le socle mésoprotérozoïque du bloc d’Arequipa, a été comblée par des couches de roches volcaniques tholéitiques – calco-alcalines de l’Albien au Thithonien atteignant 9 km d’épaisseur. Vers l’est, l’ensemble a fini par former des hauts fonds. Vers 105 à 101 Ma, les roches ont été plissées fortement puis recoupées par une suite d’intrusions vers 103 ± 2 Ma, durant et juste après la déformation, et plus tard dans l’intervalle 94 – 82 Ma, probablement par des plutons de subduction du batholite côtier. Quant à la fosse d’accumulation péruvienne de l’ouest, elle repose sur un socle métamorphique paléozoïque, et elle est constituée d’une plateforme silicoclastique – carbonate à pente ouest et d’un bassin contigu comblé par des grès, des schistes, des marnes et des calcaires finement laminés atteignant 5 km d’épaisseur et qui se sont déposés en continu durant tout le Crétacé. Les roches de la fosse d’accumulation péruvienne de l’ouest ont été décollées de leur socle, plissées et charriées vers l’est durant la fin du Crétacé et le début du Tertiaire. Parce que les facies et les profondeurs de sédimentation de ces deux fosses d’accumulation dont incompatibles, et que leur développement et leur socle sont différents, ces deux fosses ne peuvent pas s’être développées côte à côte. À cause de l’épaisseur accumulée, de sa composition et du style de son magmatisme, nous pensons que la fosse d’accumulation de Huarmey-Cañete représente un arc magmatique qui s’est éteinte vers 105 Ma, lorsque l’arc est entré en collision avec un terrane inconnu. Nous pensons que le magmatisme subséquent aux premières intrusions mafiques syntectoniques et aux réseaux de dykes de 103 ± 2 Ma sont à mettre au compte d’une rupture de plaque. Le bloc Huarmey-Cañete-batholitique côtier et son socle mésoprotérozoïque sont demeurés au large jusqu’à 77 ± 5 Ma, moment où il est entré en collision et a été poussé par-dessus la marge ouest sud-américaine partiellement subduite, pour ainsi former la zone de chevauchement de vergence est de Marañon. Nous croyons que la séquence majeure de plutonisme et d’intrusion de dykes qui a succédé à la collision finale à 73–62 Ma doit être reliée à une rupture de la plaque lithosphérique sud-américaine à pendage ouest. Le magmatisme de 53 Ma et plus récent qui a succédé à la collision finale, a été généré par la subduction vers l’est de la lithosphère océanique du Pacifique sous l’Amérique du Sud. Des relations temporelles et spatiales similaires qui existent tout le long des deux Amériques représentent la collision terminale d’un ruban continental d’arcs avec les Amériques durant la phase tectonique laramienne de la fin du Crétacé–début du Tertiaire. Elle a donc séparé la subduction vers l’ouest de longue date de la période de subduction vers l’est plus jeune caractérisant la situation actuelle. Nous considérons que le ruban continental de la Cordillère s’est constitué durant le Mésozoïque au-dessus d’une zone majeure de convection descendante entre Tuzo et Jason, le long de la limite entre les plaques océaniques Panthalassique et Pacifique.

show abstract

“…Within Alaska, sedimentary rocks of the Kahiltna Basin were folded and thrust northward coincident with kyanite-grade metamorphism and the development of the Campanian-Maastrichtian Cantwell thrust-top basin (Ridgway et al 2002;Trop and Ridgway 2007). The hypsometry of the modern Brooks Range was caused by thick-skinned Laramide thrusting (Moore et al 1997). During and after terminal Laramide collision there was a northward migration of the Cordilleran Ribbon Continent (Hildebrand 2013).…”

Section: Laramide Eventmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…I consider the Laramide as an event, not simply a structural style, and therefore it is variable along strike. The event, which is perhaps best known for its thickskinned thrusting within the Great Basin-Colorado Plateau and Alaskan sectors (Hamilton 1988;Dickinson et al 1988;Moore et al 1997), is also represented by late Cretaceous thinskinned thrust belts throughout Alaska, the Canadian Rockies, and eastern Mexico (Coney 1971;Hildebrand 2013). The Cordilleran Ribbon Continent continues southward through the Antilles to South America where the Great Arc of the Caribbean and the Caribbean-Columbia oceanic plateau were accreted to northwestern South America above a westward dipping subduction zone at about 75 Ma (Kennan and Pindell 2009).…”

Section: Laramide Eventmentioning

confidence: 99%

Geology, Mantle Tomography, and Inclination Corrected Paleogeographic Trajectories Support Westward Subduction During Cretaceous Orogenesis in the North American Cordillera

Hildebrand

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Geological evidence, including the presence of two passive margin platforms, juxtaposed and mismatched deformation between North America and more outboard terranes, as well as the lack of rift deposits, suggest that North America was the lower plate during both the Sevier and Laramide events and that subduction dipped westward beneath the Cordilleran Ribbon Continent (Rubia). Terranes within the composite ribbon continent, now present in the Canadian Cordillera, collided with western North America during the 125–105 Ma Sevier event and were transported northward during the ~80–58 Ma Laramide event, which affected the Cordillera from South America to Alaska. New high-resolution mantle tomography beneath North America reveals a huge slab wall that extends vertically for over 1000 km, marks the site of long-lived subduction, and provides independent verification of the westward-dipping subduction model. Other workers analyzed paleogeographic trajectories and concluded that the initial collision took place in Canada at about 160 Ma – a time and place for which there is no deformational thickening on the North American platform – and later farther west where subduction was not likely westward, but eastward. However, by utilizing a meridionally corrected North American paleogeographic trajectory, coupled with the geologically most reasonable location for the initial deformation, the position of western North America with respect to the relict superslab parsimoniously accounts for the timing and extents of both the Sevier and Laramide events. SOMMAIRELes indications géologiques, en particulier la présence de deux marges de plateforme passives, de déformations adjacentes non-conformes entre l’Amérique du Nord et les terranes extérieurs, ainsi que l’absence de gisements de rift, permet de croire que l’Amérique du Nord était la plaque sous-jacente durant les événements de Sevier et de Laramide et que la subduction plongeait vers l’ouest sous le continent rubané de la Cordillères (Rubia). Les terranes du continent rubané composite, maintenant au sein de la Cordillère canadienne, sont entrés en collision avec l’ouest de l’Amérique du Nord durant l’événement Sevier (125-105 Ma), et ont été transportés vers le nord durant l’événement Laramide (~80–58 Ma), laquelle a affecté la Cordillère, de l’Amérique du Sud à l’Alaska. Une nouvelle tomographie haute résolution du manteau sous l’Amérique du Nord montre la présence d’un gigantesque mur de plaques vertical qui s’étend sur 1 000 km, marque le site d’une subduction de longue haleine, et offre une validation indépendante du modèle d’une subduction à pendage vers l’ouest. D’autres chercheurs ont analysé les trajectoires paléogéographiques et conclu que la collision initiale s’est produite au Canada vers 160 Ma – un moment et un endroit sans épaississement par déformation sur la plateforme d’Amérique du Nord – et plus tard plus à l’ouest, là où la subduction n’était vraisemblablement pas vers l’ouest, mais vers l’est. Cela dit, en considérant une trajectoire paléogéographique de l’Amérique du Nord corrigée longitudinalement, avec la position géologique la plus probable de la déformation initiale, la position de la portion ouest de l’Amérique du Nord par rapport aux restes de la super-plaque explique alors facilement la chronologie et l’étendue des épisodes Sevier et Laramide.

show abstract

Crustal implications of bedrock geology along the Trans‐Alaska Crustal Transect (TACT) in the Brooks Range, northern Alaska

Cited by 48 publications

References 51 publications

Lithostratigraphic, conodont, and other faunal links between lower Paleozoic strata in northern and central Alaska and northeastern Russia

Lithostratigraphic, conodont, and other faunal links between lower Paleozoic strata in northern and central Alaska and northeastern Russia

Arc and Slab-Failure Magmatism in Cordilleran Batholiths I – The Cretaceous Coastal Batholith of Peru and its Role in South American Orogenesis and Hemispheric Subduction Flip

Geology, Mantle Tomography, and Inclination Corrected Paleogeographic Trajectories Support Westward Subduction During Cretaceous Orogenesis in the North American Cordillera

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About