2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.002
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal evolution and the temporality of anorthosites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 191 publications
4
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This stage was followed by an extended period of emplacement, whereby magmatism in individual massifs commonly lasted up to 100 m.y. (Charlier et al, 2010;Ashwal and Bybee, 2017). Many anorthosites are spatially and temporally related to the convergent margin along the Laurentia-Baltica side of the Columbia-Rodinia supercontinent-an example of a 'Goldilocks period' in the Earth history when the combination of amalgamated continental lithosphere, high ambient mantle temperature and location of the active margin produced conditions that were 'just right'.…”
Section: The Metamorphic Record and Time's Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This stage was followed by an extended period of emplacement, whereby magmatism in individual massifs commonly lasted up to 100 m.y. (Charlier et al, 2010;Ashwal and Bybee, 2017). Many anorthosites are spatially and temporally related to the convergent margin along the Laurentia-Baltica side of the Columbia-Rodinia supercontinent-an example of a 'Goldilocks period' in the Earth history when the combination of amalgamated continental lithosphere, high ambient mantle temperature and location of the active margin produced conditions that were 'just right'.…”
Section: The Metamorphic Record and Time's Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Massif anorthosites and related igneous rocks are focussed, particularly in terms of overall area of anorthosite, in the period 1.8-0.8 Ga, but with minor examples extend the overall range from ca. 2.6-0.5 Ga (Ashwal and Bybee, 2017). They are spatially and temporally linked to overall convergent continental plate margins, occurring in syn-subduction environments but well inboard of the inferred plate margin, or in postsubduction, collisional orogenic settings (Ashwal and Bybee, 2017;McLelland et al, 2010;Whitmeyer and Karlstrom, 2007).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.6-0.5 Ga (Ashwal and Bybee, 2017). They are spatially and temporally linked to overall convergent continental plate margins, occurring in syn-subduction environments but well inboard of the inferred plate margin, or in postsubduction, collisional orogenic settings (Ashwal and Bybee, 2017;McLelland et al, 2010;Whitmeyer and Karlstrom, 2007). Massif anorthosite formation is related to the ponding of magma of basaltic composition at depths of 30-40 km, at the base of the crust, where plagioclase rich mushes accumulate through flotation separation, and which then rise over protracted periods through the crust, were variably contaminated, prior to emplacement at mid-crustal levels (Ashwal and Bybee, 2017, and references therein).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proterozoic massif-type anorthosites are large intrusions of anorthositic rocks (plagioclase > 75%, Fe-Mg silicate minerals < 25%; Ashwal 1993) commonly associated with coeval ferroan (or A type) granitoids in the so-called AMCG (anorthosite-mangerite-charnockite-granite) suites (Emslie 1978;Ashwal 1993;Heinonen 2012). Questions concerning the sources and nature of parental magmas (e.g., Frost and Frost 1997;Longhi et al 1999;Heinonen et al 2015), intrusion and emplacement mechanisms, depth(s) of crystallization and emplacement, tectonic setting (e.g., Scoates and Frost 1996;McLelland et al 2010), and temporal restrictions (Ashwal 2010;Ashwal and Bybee 2017) of anorthosites have puzzled and perplexed petrologists for decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%