2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-017-9209-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal azimuthal anisotropy in the trans-North China orogen and adjacent regions from receiver functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yang et al () used the P m s phase to map crustal anisotropy in the CNCC beneath 23 stations and obtained an average δt of 0.23 s. Comparison between our measurements and those by Yang et al () is shown in Figure . While some differences exist at some stations in the Datong Basin, the δt and ϕ measurements in the whole Yanshan Uplift from the two studies are generally consistent.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Crustal Anisotropy Studiessupporting
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Yang et al () used the P m s phase to map crustal anisotropy in the CNCC beneath 23 stations and obtained an average δt of 0.23 s. Comparison between our measurements and those by Yang et al () is shown in Figure . While some differences exist at some stations in the Datong Basin, the δt and ϕ measurements in the whole Yanshan Uplift from the two studies are generally consistent.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Crustal Anisotropy Studiessupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Reverberation removal was applied to 28 of the 112 stations. Figure 6 shows all the 112 crustal anisotropy measurements and the comparison between the P m s moveout results from this study and the results of Yang et al (2018b). The observed t measurements at the stations vary from 0.06 to 0.54 s with an average of 0.25 ± 0.08 s. For stations located in the Zhangjiakou-Penglai Fault Zone, the mean t is 0.40 ± 0.07 s, which is about twice as large as that observed at stations in the other areas (0.23 ± 0.08 s; Figure 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations