Cruciferae variae

Schulz, O. E.

doi:10.2307/3994734

Cited by 8 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Al-Shehbaz). Schulz (1936) placed these taxa in the tribes Sisymbrieae, Lepidieae, Euclidieae, and Arabideae, respectively, but molecular data , O'Kane and Al-Shehbaz 2003, Beilstein et al 2006 clearly demonstrated that the four genera are very closely related and therefore should be placed in the same tribe/clade (see below).…”

Section: Origin and Classificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hayek (1911), followed by Schulz (1936) and Janchen (1942), provided the first theory on the origin of the Brassicaceae. They believed in a New World origin of the family from the capparaceous subfamily Cleomoideae through the ''basal'' mustard tribe Theylopodieae (Stanleyeae).…”

Section: Origin and Classificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A closer comparison of Aethionema with some members of the Cleomaceae is given in the section on major clades of the family. Although Schulz's (1936) classification of the Brassicaceae has been modified and criticized (e.g. Janchen 1942;Al-Shehbaz 1973, it continued to be the most widely used to the present.…”

Section: Origin and Classificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, diplecolobal cotyledons (i.e. with incumbent cotyledons folded two or more times), thought to be unique to the tribe Heliophileae (Schulz 1936), evolved independently in Lepidium L. s.l. (Hewson 1981, Mummenhoff et al 2001a.…”

Section: Charactersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Genera of the 25 tribes listed below were compared to that of de Candolle (1821a, b), Prantl (1891), Hayek (1911) and Schulz's (1936) tribal classification to determine if any significant similarity patterns exist.…”

Section: Major Cladesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Systematics and phylogeny of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae): an overview

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. A critical review of characters used in the systematics of the Brassicaceae is given, and aspects of the origin, classification, and generic delimitation of the family discussed. Molecular phylogenetic studies of the family were reviewed, and major clades identified. Based on molecular studies, especially from the ndhF chloroplast gene, and careful evaluation of morphology and generic circumscriptions, a new tribal alignment of the Brassicaceae is proposed. In all, 25 tribes are recognized, of which seven (Aethionemeae, Boechereae, Descurainieae, Eutremeae, Halimolobeae, Noccaeeae, and Smelowskieae) are described as new. For each tribe, the center(s) of distribution, morphology, and number of taxa are given. Of the 338 genera currently recognized in the Brassicaceae, about 260 genera (or about 77%) were either assigned or tentatively assigned to the 25 tribes. Some problems relating to various genera and tribes are discussed, and future research developments are briefly covered.

show abstract

Section: Origin and Classificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Origin and Classificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Origin and Classificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Charactersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Major Cladesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Systematics and phylogeny of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae): an overview

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Systematic position of Ivania, Scoliaxon, and Phravenia (Brassicaceae)

Warwick

Sauder

Al‐Shehbaz

2011

TAXON

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sequence data from the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region were used to determine the tribal placements of the previously unassigned genera Ivania, Scoliaxon, and Phravenia (gen. nov.; named in honor of Dr. Peter H. Raven). The utilization of the ITS-based phylogenetic tribal backbone of Brassicaceae placed three genera in relation to the 44 recognized tribes in the family. Scoliaxon, although showing remarkable morphological similarities to Asta (Asteae), formed an independent clade with 100% bootstrap (BS) support in the tribal analysis, whereas both Ivania and Phravenia clustered with the Thelypodieae clade (96% BS support). In a second and more comprehensive analysis of Thelypodieae, both species of Ivania formed a clade with 61% BS support within the tribe and were affiliated to other Thelypodieae genera from the Southern Hemisphere. The monospecific Phravenia (P. viereckii, formerly Arabis/Dryopetalon viereckii ) formed a clade with 74%-76% bootstrap support within Thelypodieae, and its species did not resolve with Dryopetalon or Sibara in which it had been previously assigned. The present findings support the placement of Ivania and Phravenia in Thelypodieae, as well as the recognition of the new genus Phravenia and new tribe Scoliaxoneae, both of which are formally described herein.

show abstract

From species to trait evolution in Aethionema (Brassicaceae)

Mohammadin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cruciferae variae

Cited by 8 publications

References 0 publications

Systematics and phylogeny of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae): an overview

Systematics and phylogeny of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae): an overview

Systematic position of Ivania, Scoliaxon, and Phravenia (Brassicaceae)

From species to trait evolution in Aethionema (Brassicaceae)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About