2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.12.180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRT-600.01 Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Artery Lesion With Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) versus Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IVUS’s cross-sectional intraluminal view provides significant advantage in assessment of ambiguous lesions when compared to the 2D x-ray projection of angiograms alone, and has been shown to yield superior outcomes, i.e. a decrease in incidence of under-expansion and incomplete apposition to the vessel wall [ 6 , 7 ]. In situs inversus, IVUS can be particularly useful, especially when the operator is unaccustomed to seeing reverse imaging of the heart and taking into consideration the anatomical issues that can present in ways such as lesion foreshortening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IVUS’s cross-sectional intraluminal view provides significant advantage in assessment of ambiguous lesions when compared to the 2D x-ray projection of angiograms alone, and has been shown to yield superior outcomes, i.e. a decrease in incidence of under-expansion and incomplete apposition to the vessel wall [ 6 , 7 ]. In situs inversus, IVUS can be particularly useful, especially when the operator is unaccustomed to seeing reverse imaging of the heart and taking into consideration the anatomical issues that can present in ways such as lesion foreshortening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%