2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2960873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRowNet: Deep Network for Crop Row Detection in UAV Images

Abstract: Nowadays, the development of robots and smart tractors for the automation of sowing, harvesting, weeding etc. is transforming agriculture. Farmers are moving from an agriculture where everything is applied uniformly to a much more targeted farming. This new kind of farming is commonly referred to as precision agriculture. However for autonomous guidance of these agricultural machines and even sometimes for weed detection an accurate detection of crop rows is required. In this paper we propose a new method call… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Precision is the percentage of accurately retrieved crop rows to the total number of retrieved rows. Bah et al combined a convolutional neural network and the Hough transform to retrieve beet rows in RGB images with a row spacing of 50 cm and an image spatial resolution of approximately 1 cm, and they presented a mean recall value of 0.70 and a mean precision value of 0.90 [32]. In this study, we used the CRDA value to evaluate the performance of different methods for crop row detection.…”
Section: Comparison Of Crop Row Detection Results With Those Of Other Studies Using Uav Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precision is the percentage of accurately retrieved crop rows to the total number of retrieved rows. Bah et al combined a convolutional neural network and the Hough transform to retrieve beet rows in RGB images with a row spacing of 50 cm and an image spatial resolution of approximately 1 cm, and they presented a mean recall value of 0.70 and a mean precision value of 0.90 [32]. In this study, we used the CRDA value to evaluate the performance of different methods for crop row detection.…”
Section: Comparison Of Crop Row Detection Results With Those Of Other Studies Using Uav Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the discrimination accuracy and distinctiveness requirements of a crop rows detection algorithm varies depending on the application. Mature results have been presented in the literature with the use of deep convolutional neural networks [4] with the objective of increasing detection accuracy and reducing the fault rate for weeding applications and offline planning. On the other hand, for autonomous navigation applications, crop rows are identified as a local feature in a framework that takes the inaccuracy of feature extraction as an input to a model matching and filtering step [5,17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of multiview coplanar extraction using the proposed approach are evaluated by the quantitative metrics, i.e., recall, precision, and intersection over union (IoU), which can be computed as [47] Recall = (R GT ∩ R q )/R GT , (…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Multiview Coplanar Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%