2007
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(07)60031-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crown-to-implant ratios of single tooth implant-supported restorations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
59
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
59
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Papavasiliou et al (10) demonstrated that oblique forces increased the stress concentration in the implant and bone. These results are also in accordance with the literature that describes the influence of increase in crown height on the transference of occlusal forces (9,11,13,15,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, Papavasiliou et al (10) demonstrated that oblique forces increased the stress concentration in the implant and bone. These results are also in accordance with the literature that describes the influence of increase in crown height on the transference of occlusal forces (9,11,13,15,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Studies testing survival rates for 1.3:1 (Schulte et al, 2007), 0.8:1 to 3.0:1 (Rokni et al, 2005), and 2:1 and 3:1 (Blanes et al, 2007) implant-to-crown ratios found similar results, with bone resorption at normal levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In this way, the use of implants to rehabilitate posterior regions of maxillae or mandibles often requires the use of short implants to short implants (Srinivasan et al, 2012) and to the fabrication of a higher prosthetic crown (Schulte et al, 2007;Tawil et al, 2006). From a biomechanical point of view, the literature indicates that increase in prosthetic crown height can be a dangerous factor to the stress distribution as determined by mechanical technique analysis (Nissan et al, 2011) and by 3-D finite element analysis (Sütpideler et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introduction (Manuscript Without Marked Changes)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…zur Verteilung der Belastung[12] wurden die beiden Implantatkronen unter Beachtung der Hygienefähigkeit miteinander verblockt. Abb 8. 9 Enorale Situation nach Sinuslift, Augmentation mit einem Knochenersatzmaterial und Insertion von 2 Implantaten im Oberkiefer links Abb.…”
unclassified