1996
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183x003600030039x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crown Morphology Relationships among Alfalfa Plant Introductions and Cultivars

Abstract: The alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) crown is an important morphological structure because of its association with regrowth, yield, and persistence. The objectives of this research were to evaluate variability for crown morphological traits among 1067 plant introductions (P.I.s) and 110 North American cultivars, to determine the association between crown morphological traits and germplasm sources, and to compare the association between crown morphological traits and fall dormancy classes for North American alfalfa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When entries from both cultivars were analysed together, significant correlations were found in the second, third and total harvests of the clonal study (P < 0.01, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively; data not shown). However, even when correlation coefficients were significant, these values were of low magnitude (r < 0.7), making their biological significance doubtful (Smith et al 1991, Marquez-Ortiz et al 1996. A similar study involving alfalfa cultivar 'G636' (E. T. Bingham, unpublished data) did not find significant correlations between crown size and forage yield of clones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When entries from both cultivars were analysed together, significant correlations were found in the second, third and total harvests of the clonal study (P < 0.01, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively; data not shown). However, even when correlation coefficients were significant, these values were of low magnitude (r < 0.7), making their biological significance doubtful (Smith et al 1991, Marquez-Ortiz et al 1996. A similar study involving alfalfa cultivar 'G636' (E. T. Bingham, unpublished data) did not find significant correlations between crown size and forage yield of clones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The crown size of space-planted clones dug 16 months later showed a strong association (r > 0.7, P < 0.01) with DFY (Table 2). This is to be expected since crown width increases with an increase in crown size and, as a consequence, has the capacity to bear more shoots (Marquez-Ortiz et al 1996). However, the crown size of these clones could not be predicted based on the crown size of the parental plant from which they were derived, as these traits were poorly correlated (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Entre as populações do cv. São Gabriel, P37, P38, Alqueire e Corte mostraram hábito de crescimento mais prostrado que as demais, o que pode ser vantajoso sob pastejo, pois plantas mais prostradas apresentam suas gemas de crescimento próximas à superfície do solo e, portanto, estão mais protegidas da ação dos herbívoros (Nelson & Moser, 1994). A importância do hábito de crescimento para o cornichão foi confirmada no trabalho de Caroso et al (1981), por meio de avaliações sob cortes, no qual progênies e cultivares mais eretos foram menos persistentes.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Em cornichão, segundo Marquez-Ortiz et al (1996), alta produtividade e persistência podem estar associadas à morfologia da coroa, indicando maior ou menor vulnerabilidade a Tabela 2 -Estatura e hábito de crescimento de genótipos de Lotus corniculatus L. Tabela 4 -Características de folhas de genótipos de Lotus corniculatus L. Observou-se que todos os genótipos apresentaram hastes subterrâneas, que, apesar de não serem rizomas, são igualmente importantes para a persistência da planta, não como órgão armazenador de reservas, como os rizomas, mas como um local protegido, capaz de dar origem a novas hastes e, por fragmentação, a novos indivíduos. Essas hastes, por permanecerem abaixo da superfície do solo, mostraram-se aclorofiladas e deram origem a hastes aéreas, que diferiram dos rizomas, por serem mais delgadas e não possuírem folhas escamosas, razão pela qual não foram consideradas rizomas típicos.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified