2016
DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2016.1130501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowdsourcing the curriculum: Redefining e-learning practices through peer-generated approaches

Abstract: Inclusion of open resources that employ a peer-generated approach is changing who learns what, from whom, and via what means. With these changes, there is a shift in responsibilities from the 2 course designer to motivated and self-directed learner-participants. While much research on elearning has addressed challenges of creating and sustaining participatory environments, the development of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) calls for new approaches beyond the existing research on participatory environments … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With such a high percentage of these students being new to the peer mentoring sites and with previous research showing the many challenges that individuals in new, computersupported learning environments face, including adjustment to new media, new rules of behavior, and new course materials and classmates (Haythornthwaite, 2002), this activity was surprising. The analysis of this activity provides important data regarding the ways in which undergraduate students take or maintain control in an online mentoring site, adding to this body of knowledge (Paulin & Haythornthwaite, 2016;Rheingold, 2000Rheingold, , 2007.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…With such a high percentage of these students being new to the peer mentoring sites and with previous research showing the many challenges that individuals in new, computersupported learning environments face, including adjustment to new media, new rules of behavior, and new course materials and classmates (Haythornthwaite, 2002), this activity was surprising. The analysis of this activity provides important data regarding the ways in which undergraduate students take or maintain control in an online mentoring site, adding to this body of knowledge (Paulin & Haythornthwaite, 2016;Rheingold, 2000Rheingold, , 2007.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is significant because they were all very active participants in this site and influential in driving and carrying conversations. These interactions benefit the learners as Paulin and Haythornthwaite (2016) describe, exposing them to more and different perspectives and integrating them in the education process and provide a view of learning that can influence the design and use of future learning networks (Haythornthwaite, 2013). The first-year students selected for this study were adjusting well to their new online learning environment and taking the initiative to share ideas, ask questions, and interact with one another.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These learners maintain their own responsibility for reading source material, engaging with fellow learners, and completing learning assignments. At times, they help the whole learning process by acting as explainers for others, synthesizers of material, citation providers [21], and active evaluators of others' work [36]. Personal information management and personal learning management become prominent for these learners, as they pick, choose, and consolidate the use of particular social media and forums for their learning practices and their learning portfolios (e.g., essays and reflections posted as blogs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%