2015
DOI: 10.1002/poi3.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowdsourcing for Public Policy and Government

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…New technologies which involve more people in policy processes could be beneficial to inter alia, anti-corruption policies. The potential benefits of crowdsourcing for government and public policy have been summarised by Lehdonvirta & Bright (2015) and the use of crowdsourcing for corruption reporting has been discussed in detail by Zinnbauer (2015). Collective actions and social mobilisation against corruption in this dimension have become possible only in recent years thanks to the emergence of new technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New technologies which involve more people in policy processes could be beneficial to inter alia, anti-corruption policies. The potential benefits of crowdsourcing for government and public policy have been summarised by Lehdonvirta & Bright (2015) and the use of crowdsourcing for corruption reporting has been discussed in detail by Zinnbauer (2015). Collective actions and social mobilisation against corruption in this dimension have become possible only in recent years thanks to the emergence of new technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable geographical inequities remain. In a 2014 study 4 , Graham and several colleagues analysed more than 60,000 transactions on one major platform in March 2013. Most jobs, they found, were listed by employers in high-income countries and completed by workers in low-or middle-income countries (see 'The gigs are up').…”
Section: E L Ay I N G T H E R O B O T U P R I S I N Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…seja na forma clássica da chamada e-participação (e-participation) que no novo tema do crowdsourcing digital em políticas públicas (cLARK et al, 2016;LEHDONvIRTA;BRIGHT, 2015;PRPIĆ;TAEIHAGH;MELTON, 2015;ROYO;YETANO, 2015) e legislações (cHRIsTENsEN; KARJALAINEN;NURMINEN, 2015), por exemplo, a ideia de boa governança ou de governos eficientes pode for-necer horizonte normativo suficiente para justificar a necessidade de participação pública como colaboração para governos e parlamentos digitais, sem que se precise recorrer à ideia de participação como aumento do poder civil (empowerment), compartilhamento de poder, reafirmação da soberania popular ou como forma de democracia direta, que são as abordagens típicas da participação pela democracia digital. Esta abordagem da e-participação menos sobrecarregada pelas demandas da teoria democrática, por exemplo, é muito comum na contribuição massiva e crescente da área de computação para o subcampo do governo eletrôni-co. Mas também em estudos da área de Administração.…”
Section: Os Subcampos E As Suas Linhas De Pesquisaunclassified