2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cvprw.2017.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowdsourcing for Chromosome Segmentation and Deep Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Charters and Graham [4] provided an algorithm to segment according to the comparison between the band profiles and the templates. Sharma et al [1] used crowdsourcing to segment out the chromosomes and represented a method to evaluate the results. Many approaches based on the heuristic rules and geometry are also represented, such as [5]- [7].…”
Section: A Chromosome Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Charters and Graham [4] provided an algorithm to segment according to the comparison between the band profiles and the templates. Sharma et al [1] used crowdsourcing to segment out the chromosomes and represented a method to evaluate the results. Many approaches based on the heuristic rules and geometry are also represented, such as [5]- [7].…”
Section: A Chromosome Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annotation in pixel-level is daunting for microscopic images like the metaphase chromosome image. The widely used method to collect annotated data is crowdsourcing [1]; however, the quality of these crowdsourcing data is hard to ensure, because the annotation of medical images is a tough task and requires operators to have a wealth of experience. As the advent of generative adversarial networks (GAN), many synthesis methods based on GAN had been developed [15], [16].…”
Section: A Chromosome Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ehteshami Bejnordi showed the excellent performance of an improved CNN in lymph node metastasis detection [9]. Monika [10] used a method combining the crowdsourcing, preprocessing and deep learning to segment out and classify chromosomes especially with overlapping chromosomes. The accuracy of classification was 86.7%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%