2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10660-015-9183-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Crowdsourcing” as a tool for e-participation: two experiences regarding CO2 emissions at municipal level

Abstract: Public administrations need to find innovative approaches to solving changing problems and to fulfilling their duties. Crowdsourcing in local governments could be defined as the use of new technologies in order to take advantage of citizen knowledge to find solutions to municipal problems. This paper analyzes two experiences of crowdsourcing at local level, and the opinions of the citizens and managers involved, to provide an initial assessment of its effectiveness and suggest avenues for improvement. Engaging… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
36
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Zuccon et al (2013), crowdsourcing provides urban governments with an opportunity of reaching higher a number of participants (it enables to harness collective intelligence among population in ways face-to-face meetings cannot (Brabham, 2009)) and exploit citizens' knowledge (citizens have rich knowledge of their concerns) to develop innovative solutions to increasingly serious and complex societal problems. This is confirmed by Royo & Yetano (2015), who state that crowdsourcing enables municipalities to take advantage of citizens' knowledge to find solutions to pre-defined problems.…”
Section: Benefits Of Crowdsourcingmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Zuccon et al (2013), crowdsourcing provides urban governments with an opportunity of reaching higher a number of participants (it enables to harness collective intelligence among population in ways face-to-face meetings cannot (Brabham, 2009)) and exploit citizens' knowledge (citizens have rich knowledge of their concerns) to develop innovative solutions to increasingly serious and complex societal problems. This is confirmed by Royo & Yetano (2015), who state that crowdsourcing enables municipalities to take advantage of citizens' knowledge to find solutions to pre-defined problems.…”
Section: Benefits Of Crowdsourcingmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Besides helping to solve local problems, the fact of engaging a crowd of people to address complex issues save the administration money (Schweitzer, Buchinger, Gassmann, & Obrist, 2013;Royo & Yetano, 2015) and lead to more legitimate choices as it results in the design of better, more socially rooted, balanced and realistic policies (Spiliotopoulou, Charalabidis, N. Loukis, & Diamantopoulou, 2014). This is confirmed by Zuccon et al (2013), who, proved that crowdsourcing enables to reach a higher number of participants and provides results as valuable as those furnished by traditional methods, at half the cost and collecting five times more data.…”
Section: Benefits Of Crowdsourcingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alió and Gallego [71], on the one hand, and Royo and Yetano [72], on the other, point out that in matters of sustainability, citizen participation plays a critical role. As Royo, Yetano and Acerete [68] identified, the global effort for environmental protection goes hand-in-hand with citizens well-informed of environmental policies and initiatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…seja na forma clássica da chamada e-participação (e-participation) que no novo tema do crowdsourcing digital em políticas públicas (cLARK et al, 2016;LEHDONvIRTA;BRIGHT, 2015;PRPIĆ;TAEIHAGH;MELTON, 2015;ROYO;YETANO, 2015) e legislações (cHRIsTENsEN; KARJALAINEN;NURMINEN, 2015), por exemplo, a ideia de boa governança ou de governos eficientes pode for-necer horizonte normativo suficiente para justificar a necessidade de participação pública como colaboração para governos e parlamentos digitais, sem que se precise recorrer à ideia de participação como aumento do poder civil (empowerment), compartilhamento de poder, reafirmação da soberania popular ou como forma de democracia direta, que são as abordagens típicas da participação pela democracia digital. Esta abordagem da e-participação menos sobrecarregada pelas demandas da teoria democrática, por exemplo, é muito comum na contribuição massiva e crescente da área de computação para o subcampo do governo eletrôni-co. Mas também em estudos da área de Administração.…”
Section: Os Subcampos E As Suas Linhas De Pesquisaunclassified