2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowdsourcing and organizational forms: Emerging trends and research implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…BYou don't necessarily know who is on the other end of a data point … It could be a retired botany professor reporting on wildflowers or a pure amateur with an untrained eye. As a result, it is difficult to guarantee the quality of the data.Î n many emerging crowdsourcing environments, such as micro-task markets (Garcia-Molina et al 2016;Lukyanenko and Parsons 2018;Ogunseye et al 2017;Palacios et al 2016), one of the ways to deal with information quality is to restrict participation to those members of the community deemed competent to produce high-quality information (Allahbakhsh et al 2013;Chittilappilly et al 2016;Ogunseye et al 2017). While this is technically also possible to do in citizen science, it both runs against the spirit of openness and inclusion and can jeopardize the recruitment and retention of contributors that is key to success in projects that rely on voluntary labor.…”
Section: A Multitude Of Wicked Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BYou don't necessarily know who is on the other end of a data point … It could be a retired botany professor reporting on wildflowers or a pure amateur with an untrained eye. As a result, it is difficult to guarantee the quality of the data.Î n many emerging crowdsourcing environments, such as micro-task markets (Garcia-Molina et al 2016;Lukyanenko and Parsons 2018;Ogunseye et al 2017;Palacios et al 2016), one of the ways to deal with information quality is to restrict participation to those members of the community deemed competent to produce high-quality information (Allahbakhsh et al 2013;Chittilappilly et al 2016;Ogunseye et al 2017). While this is technically also possible to do in citizen science, it both runs against the spirit of openness and inclusion and can jeopardize the recruitment and retention of contributors that is key to success in projects that rely on voluntary labor.…”
Section: A Multitude Of Wicked Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tal modelo de interação tem sido cada vez mais empregado por empresas nos últimos anos, assemelhando-se a uma estratégia de terceirização à execução de uma tarefa ao invés de atribuí-la a um indivíduo ou equipe da própria organização (Gerber, Hui, & Kuo, n.d.;Howe, 2008;Jeppesen & Lakhani, 2010;Magdaleno & García, 2014;Menezes, 2016;Palacios, Corral, Nisar, & Grijalvo, 2016;Peng, Zhu, Shu, & Wu, 2016). De tal modo, a organização se compromete a realizar uma tarefa voluntariamente utilizando diferentes conhecimentos e unindo pessoas de diferentes perfis com o objetivo de produzir uma solução (Brabham, 2013;Howe, 2008).…”
Section: A Evolução Da Economia Colaborativa E O Estilo De Vida Colabunclassified
“…The second perspective addresses the benefits producers may gain from users as sources of innovation-related knowledge (Bogers et al, 2010). This perspective includes the idea of interacting with lead users to gain insights into future market needs (Morrison, Roberts, & Midgley, 2004;Ozer, 2009;Urban & von Hippel, 1988;von Hippel, 1986), crowdsourcing innovative ideas (Huang, Singh, & Srinivasan, 2014;Leimeister, Huber, Bretschneider, & Krcmar, 2009;Palacios, Martinez-Corral, Nisar, & Grijalvo, 2016;Schemmann et al, 2016), and co-creating innovations with users (Zwass, 2010). Our study belongs to this second group, as it addresses users as a valuable source of knowledge (Bogers et al, 2010;Bosch-Sijtsema & Bosch, 2015;Kaulio, 1998;Lüthje, 2004;Rothwell & Gardiner, 1985;von Hippel, 1976) that the B2B manufacturing companies can integrate in their innovation processes.…”
Section: Users In Cops Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%