Crowdsourcing and Minority Languages: The Case of Galician Inflected Infinitives1

Abstract

Results from a crowdsourced audio questionnaire show that inflected infinitives in Galician are acceptable in a broad range of contexts, different from those described for European Portuguese. Crucially, inflected infinitives with referential subjects are widely accepted only inside strong islands in Galician (complements of nouns, adjunct clauses). They are widely rejected in non-islands, notably in the complements of epistemic/factive verbs, in contrast with Portuguese and older varieties of Galician ( Gondar, 1978 ; Raposo, 1987 ). Statistical analysis shows, however, that, in the complements of epistemic/factive (and desiderative) verbs, inflected infinitives are significantly more acceptable in instances of control, whether partial or exhaustive. In fact, there is no significant difference between these two types of control in Galician, unlike in Portuguese, where inflection is generally better in instances of partial control and is not acceptable in instances of exhaustive local subject control ( Modesto, 2010 ; Sheehan, 2018a ). We propose an analysis of this pattern in terms of phase theory. The inflectional domain of non-finite clauses remains visible to the thematic domain of the next clause up, according to the less strict version of the Phase Impenetrability Condition ( Chomsky, 2001 ), allowing control to take place. Pronouns/or pronominal inflections in the inflectional domain of visible non-finite clauses therefore get controlled. In islands, however, material in the inflectional domain remains free/referential. Despite this basic pattern, the data are characterized by substantial interspeaker variation. Statistical analysis shows that gender, urban/rural birthplace and mother tongue are all significant factors in this variation, while age and region of birth are not. Most notably, urban-born male bilinguals with Spanish as their mother tongue consistently rate all sentences higher on the Likert scale. Overall, the results show that crowdsourcing can lead to empirically robust syntactic descriptions of minority languages which are likely to be subject to substantial sociolinguistic variation and where judgments from a single social group may be misrepresentative of the general picture. The study also highlights, however, the challenges associated with using crowdsourced audio-questionnaires of this kind and the need for statistical analysis of results to control for substantial amounts of variation.

Bilingualism with minority languages: Why searching for unicorn language users does not move us forward

“…The field of psychology took the lead in identifying lists that discuss inaccurate, misused, and ambiguous terms (e.g., terms like "brain region for X") as well as their uses in the scientific literature (Lilienfeld et al, 2015(Lilienfeld et al, , 2017. More recently, lists raising similar concerns within formal and experimental linguistics have been developed (Domínguez et al, 2019;Kupisch & Rothman, 2018;Leivada, 2020;Leivada & Murphy, 2021), in parallel to work identifying challenges related to data collection, participant recruitment, crowdsourcing, and variation (Cheng et al 2021;D'Alessandro et al 2021;Leivada et al 2019;Sheehan et al 2019). For instance, the term "bilingual advantage" should be used with caution.…”

O infinitivo flexionado en galego: unha análise variacionista baseada na lingua oral

“…O infinitivo flexionado do galego aparece descrito nas gramáticas de referencia da lingua (Álvarez, Regueira & Monteagudo 1986;Costas Casas et al 1988;Álvarez & Xove 2002;Freixeiro Mato 2006), nas cales tamén se inclúen, nalgúns casos, pautas para o seu uso (véxase amais Frexeiro Mato 1999). O infinitivo flexionado galego, polo seu carácter excepcional dende unha perspectiva translingüística, foi así mesmo obxecto de estudo das gramáticas formais (Longa 1994(Longa , 1999Parafita Couto 2004;Sheehan, Schäfer & Parafita Couto 2019). Estas análises están baseadas na intuición ou en experimentos de produción controlada para determinar xuízos de gramaticalidade.…”