2014
DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2014.947056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowdsourcing Accountability in a Nigerian Election

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors found that a successful collective action initiative is possible through crowdsourcing election observation through citizen-generated reports based on modern digital technologies. Such success is dependent upon (a) community mobilization and (b) responsive state institutions including the election management bodies (EMBs) (Bailard and Livingstone, 2014). In future, besides deepening the value of the parallel vote tabulation, citizen election observation has to invest heavily in crowdsourcing and crowdmapping to complement traditional election observation methodologies.…”
Section: The Crisis Of International Election Observation: the Woundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors found that a successful collective action initiative is possible through crowdsourcing election observation through citizen-generated reports based on modern digital technologies. Such success is dependent upon (a) community mobilization and (b) responsive state institutions including the election management bodies (EMBs) (Bailard and Livingstone, 2014). In future, besides deepening the value of the parallel vote tabulation, citizen election observation has to invest heavily in crowdsourcing and crowdmapping to complement traditional election observation methodologies.…”
Section: The Crisis Of International Election Observation: the Woundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ushahidi is a good example of the new tools that have become available. It is an opensource crowdsourcing platforms that was initially developed to map reports of violence in Kenya after 2008 post-election violence (Bailard and Livingston, 2014). It has been widely used to monitor elections in different countries, e.g.…”
Section: Ushahidimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In longstanding democracies like the United States, there may be fewer concerns about violence at the polls, but nonetheless, security issues regarding electoral fraud have undoubtedly increased in recent years (Norris, Garnett, and Grömping 2017). Thus, this area should receive more attention on state election websites, particularly as it pertains to allowing citizens to be active in monitoring security concerns at the polls, as is done with the ''crowd-sourcing'' model of election observation in some other countries (Bader 2013;Bailard and Livingston 2014;Gromping 2017aGromping , 2017b. Turning to their social media presence (Figure 2), 82% of states had Facebook pages and 88% of states had Twitter handles.…”
Section: Behind the Screensmentioning
confidence: 99%