2015
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowdsourced Action-Model Acquisition for Planning

Abstract: AI planning techniques often require a given set of action models provided as input. Creating action models is, however, a difficult task that costs much manual effort. The problem of action-model acquisition has drawn a lot of interest from researchers in the past. Despite the success of the previous systems, they are all based on the assumption that there are enough training examples for learning high-quality action models. In many real-world applications, e.g., military operation, collecting a large amount… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the action model acquisition part has been evaluated in the context of CAMA already (Zhuo 2015), here we focus on evaluating the initial state acquisition part. We evaluated our approach in three planning domains, i.e., blocks 1 , depots 2 and driverlog 4 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the action model acquisition part has been evaluated in the context of CAMA already (Zhuo 2015), here we focus on evaluating the initial state acquisition part. We evaluated our approach in three planning domains, i.e., blocks 1 , depots 2 and driverlog 4 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building HITs for Action Models: For this part, we build on our work with the CAMA system (Zhuo 2015). We enumerate all possible preconditions and effects for each action.…”
Section: The Pan-crowd Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It requires the same observability of ARMS. Other approaches like AMAN [34] and RIM [35] include noisy observations and incomplete models, respectively, which means that observations of plans may be captured by imperfect sensors, thus introducing uncertainty under a full degree of observability. LOCM [36,37] initiated a family of inductive learning systems that use Finite State Machines to learn even from null state information, i.e., without the need of initial, goal or intermediate states.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most approaches that learn complete models handle deterministic tasks, and although they can tackle partial observability (Mourão et al, 2012;Zhuo and Kambhampati, 2013) or apply transfer learning (Zhuo and Yang, 2014), they do not consider uncertain effects. In this work we focus on models with uncertain effects.The most similar approaches to ours are those that learn relational action models with uncertain effects (Pasula et al, 2007;Deshpande et al, 2007;Mourão, 2014).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%