Crowding in or crowding out? How local government debt influences corporate innovation for China

Abstract

The pressure upon local governments to redeem their debt could affect government fiscal ability. It could consequently affect their fiscal policies on corporations, which might distort corporate innovation. Based on the data of Chinese Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies and the local government implicit short-term debt financed by local government financing vehicles (LGFVs) in 31 provinces, this paper shows that local government debt (LGD) negatively affects corporate R&D investment in China, thereby suggesting a strong crowding-out effect. The crowding-out effect is more pronounced when the firm is a non-state-owned enterprise (NSOE), the firm’s size is small, the firm’s age is young, or the firm is in the lower market competition. This paper provide evidence by interacting the terms that local government actions, such as consumption of fiscal resources, strengthening tax collection efforts, or consumption of credit resources, might partially account for the crowding-out effect. This study illustrates the innovation costs of local government debt.

Does credit rating agency reputation matter in China’s local government bond market?

“…Similarly, negative coefficients of Public Revenue per capita and Public Revenue Growth Rate (significant at the 1% level in Columns ( 1) and ( 2)) imply that the stronger the revenue capacity of local governments, the lower the local government bond's risk premium. Consistent with our expectation, Tbill is reported to be positively related to the risk premiums of local government bonds at issuance in Columns (1), ( 2), ( 5) and (6).…”

“…Local government bonds serve as essential sources of funds for these governments [ 4 ], accompanied by an increased scale worldwide in the past decades [ 5 ]. Scholars, practitioners, and policymakers have regarded the effective management of local government debt as a key driver of economic growth and sustainability [ 6 ]. Given that bond pricing is important in debt management, an enhanced understanding of the determinants of local government bonds’ pricing can improve market efficiency and sustain public finance in the long term.…”

Spatial and nonlinear effects of local government debt on environmental pollution: Evidence from China

“…When the debt level is lower than this threshold, the relationship between debt and economic growth is positive, but once the level exceeds this threshold, this relationship is reversed (Baum et al, 2013;Woo and Kumar, 2015). In addition, some studies have examined the effects of local government debt on other economic indicators, such as technological innovation (Xu et al, 2021), inflation (Reinhart and Rogoff, 2010), interest rate (Winter 2017), and financial risk (Zheng et al, 2021;Ba, 2022).…”

Tax incentives and green innovation—The mediating role of financing constraints and the moderating role of subsidies

“…First, Hu et al (2021) and others explored the impact of subsidies on firms' green innovation and found that the relationship was positive. Some scholars point out that excessive subsidies may crowd out firms' original R&D investment (Xu et al, 2021), which inhibits green innovation (Yi et al, 2020). With the controversy over direct cash subsidy instruments (Ren et al, 2021), tax incentives, an indirect fiscal instrument, entered the perspective (Marjanović, 2018).…”