2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.15.20064980
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowding and the epidemic intensity of COVID-19 transmission

Abstract: 34The COVID-19 pandemic is straining public health systems worldwide and major non-35 pharmaceutical interventions have been implemented to slow its spread [1][2][3][4] . During the initial phase 36 of the outbreak the spread was primarily determined by human mobility 5,6 . Yet empirical evidence 37 on the effect of key geographic factors on local epidemic spread is lacking 7 . We analyse highly-38 resolved spatial variables for cities in China together with case count data in order to investigate 39 the role … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with other work on COVID-19 that found population demography important at the US county level [ 37 ] and in other countries. Interestingly, while the correlation between the intensity of a contagious respiratory infection and population density is intuitive, our findings are actually contrary to patterns observed during Influenza seasons [ 38 ] and for COVID-19 in China [ 39 ]. The different behavior observed here could be due to COVID-19 being less reliant on environmental factors and mostly driven by social behaviours.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This is in line with other work on COVID-19 that found population demography important at the US county level [ 37 ] and in other countries. Interestingly, while the correlation between the intensity of a contagious respiratory infection and population density is intuitive, our findings are actually contrary to patterns observed during Influenza seasons [ 38 ] and for COVID-19 in China [ 39 ]. The different behavior observed here could be due to COVID-19 being less reliant on environmental factors and mostly driven by social behaviours.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…We fit multivariate logistic regression models using R (version 3.6.2) to predict the community transmission control outcome (binary R t ) using state- and week-specific estimates of mask wearing (crude and survey-weighted) and social distancing (relative residential time). State population density was included as a potential confounder given the association between population structure and SARS-CoV-2 transmission 31 , 32 as well as the association between urban versus rural regions and face mask usage 8 . Percent non-white was included as a confounder due to the relationship with epidemiological indicators of SARS-CoV-2 33 and uptake of non-pharmaceutical interventions 34 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When two Bluetooth-enabled devices are within range, the date, time, distance and duration of interaction can be recorded. The frequency or number of these interactions (analyzed anonymously to form, broadly, measures of clustering or proximal interaction rates over time) may be important given the role of sustained interaction or overcrowding of individuals [32][33][34] and contact structure in SARS-CoV-2 transmission 35 . Furthermore, Bluetooth data in combination with GPS data or a network of Bluetooth sensors can be used to quantify the amount of time people spend at home or other identified locations when lockdown measures are in place to determine if policies are effective.…”
Section: Evaluating Current Interventions and Monitoring Their Releasementioning
confidence: 99%