2019
DOI: 10.1108/vjikms-12-2018-0118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowdfunding as a new collaborative process in the knowledge economy

Abstract: Purpose The transition from industrial to social economy and from knowledge produces a paradigm shift, which is the space in which new professions, new values and even new forms of financing are shaped. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the phenomenon of crowdfunding, and the specific focus is the small- and medium-sized enterprises’ (SMEs’) dimension, typical in startups firms. This work discusses the main thematic areas in the scientific literature on the phenomenon of crowdfunding (RQ1) and how is cro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work builds on the emerging literature on crowdfunding (see Bruton et al, 2015;McKenny et al, 2017;Paoloni et al, 2019;Mochkabadi & Volkmann, 2020 for overviews and reviews). Most academic research on crowdfunding focuses on non-dilutive rewards-based platforms such as Kickstarter (e.g., Chan & Parhankangas, 2017) or peer-to-peer lending platforms such as Prosper (e.g., Hidebrand et al, 2017;Kgoroeadira et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work builds on the emerging literature on crowdfunding (see Bruton et al, 2015;McKenny et al, 2017;Paoloni et al, 2019;Mochkabadi & Volkmann, 2020 for overviews and reviews). Most academic research on crowdfunding focuses on non-dilutive rewards-based platforms such as Kickstarter (e.g., Chan & Parhankangas, 2017) or peer-to-peer lending platforms such as Prosper (e.g., Hidebrand et al, 2017;Kgoroeadira et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers organized the relevant content from the extracted articles, scrutinized it, and identified the themes on this topic. Their bibliographic analysis revealed that crowdfunding (Eiteneyer et al, 2019;Kaminski et al, 2020;Kgoroeadira et al, 2019;Paschen, 2017;Di Pietro et al, 2018) crowd sourcing (Chaudhari and Sinha, 2021;Eiteneyer et al, 2019;Foster, 2019;Paoloni et al, 2019;Paschen, 2017), equity crowdfunding (Bonini and Capizzi, 2019;Hornuf and Schwienbacher, 2017;Hornuf and Schwienbacher, 2018;Tiberius and Hauptmeijer, 2021), as well as crowd investing /crowdinvesting (Ezangina and Evstratov, 2019;Goethner et al, 2021;Hornuf and Schwienbacher, 2017;Hornuf and Schwienbacher, 2018) were the most used keywords by the authors that were featured in this analysis.…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since the first platform emerged, crowdfunding has become a new way to raise money for new ventures, and from a scientific point of view, the treatment of the crowdfunding phenomenon is developing in many areas of research, e.g. business, management, accounting, economics, econometrics and finance (Paoloni et al , 2019). However, despite this growing popularity, academic understanding of the phenomenon is quite limited (Colombo et al , 2015), and the concept of crowdfunding is in a state of evolution that makes definitions still arbitrarily limited (e.g.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This usually happens without the contribution of common financial intermediaries (Rodriguez-Ricardo et al , 2018) but through the use of the Internet (Mollick, 2014). In particular, crowdfunding is a collaborative process of a group of people who use their money in common to support the efforts of organisations and people (Paoloni et al , 2019). Taking inspiration from the principles of crowdsourcing (Kleemann et al , 2008) and microfinance (Morduch, 1999), crowdfunding can be defined as a community-based funding method (Agrawal et al , 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%