Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017 International Conference on Recent Advances in Electronics and Communication Technology (ICRAECT) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icraect.2017.66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowd Behavior Analysis: A Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The emergent dynamics of crowd behavior have been fruitfully modeled according to biological phenomena such as swarm behavior (Kok, Lim, & Chan, 2016). Classification of emergent crowd dynamics, often using computer vision technology, has typically relied on analysis of video data for features, such as crowd density estimation, motion detection, and movement/behavior tracking of individual signals or group behavior (Kok et al, 2016;Swathi, Shivakumar, & Mohana, 2017). However, it is not always feasible to obtain high-quality image, video, or speech data of a crowd in action, nor is it always feasible to obtain signals measured from each individual in an interacting crowd.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergent dynamics of crowd behavior have been fruitfully modeled according to biological phenomena such as swarm behavior (Kok, Lim, & Chan, 2016). Classification of emergent crowd dynamics, often using computer vision technology, has typically relied on analysis of video data for features, such as crowd density estimation, motion detection, and movement/behavior tracking of individual signals or group behavior (Kok et al, 2016;Swathi, Shivakumar, & Mohana, 2017). However, it is not always feasible to obtain high-quality image, video, or speech data of a crowd in action, nor is it always feasible to obtain signals measured from each individual in an interacting crowd.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In traditional crowd behavior research, the use of behavior observations, interview surveys, questionnaire surveys, and other survey methods consume a lot of manpower and material resources, and this often interferes with the target, resulting in certain theoretical errors. Modern digital technology provides a new option for the study of crowd behavior patterns [18]. Generating pedestrian behavior heat maps based on big data has achieved good results [19,20].…”
Section: Influencing Factors and Evaluation Indicators Of Microclimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buildings 2023, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 15 theoretical errors. Modern digital technology provides a new option for the study of crowd behavior patterns [18]. Generating pedestrian behavior heat maps based on big data has achieved good results [19,20].…”
Section: Influencing Factors and Evaluation Indicators Of Microclimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Li et al (2015) cover motion analysis, behavior recognition, and anomaly detection but does not cover counting, density estimation, object detection, crowd prediction, and so forth. Swathi, Shivakumar, and Mohana (2017) cover density estimation, motion detection, and behavior recognition, but do not cover object detection, and anomaly detection. Similarly, Zhang, Yu, and Yu (2018) cover only physics-inspired methods for crowd analysis and focuses on motion analysis in videos.…”
Section: Similar and Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%