2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00211-022-01303-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crouzeix-Raviart finite element method for non-autonomous variational problems with Lavrentiev gap

Abstract: We investigate the convergence of the Crouzeix-Raviart finite element method for variational problems with non-autonomous integrands that exhibit non-standard growth conditions. While conforming schemes fail due to the Lavrentiev gap phenomenon, we prove that the solution of the Crouzeix-Raviart scheme converges to a global minimiser. Numerical experiments illustrate the performance of the scheme and give additional analytical insights.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New and interesting counterexamples are in [7,8,9,10]. All this happens in presence of classical uniform ellipticity (2.21), which is somehow counterintuitive according to the narrative drawn at the beginning of this section.…”
Section: Soft Nonuniform Ellipticitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…New and interesting counterexamples are in [7,8,9,10]. All this happens in presence of classical uniform ellipticity (2.21), which is somehow counterintuitive according to the narrative drawn at the beginning of this section.…”
Section: Soft Nonuniform Ellipticitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…From a rigorous perspective, the numerical method should take into account the possible occurrence of the Lavrentiev phenomenon, whereby the infimum of the energy in A might be strictly less than the infimum among Lipschitz maps in A (such as those generated by a finite-element scheme). For discussions see [6,2,3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that this is essentially the only point where the assumed convexity of t → tg(t) is used (this implies that z → |z|g(|z|) is convex as g(•) is also non-decreasing). For more related results on the absence of Lavrentiev phenomenon we refer to the recent papers [1,3,4,16,50,51] and related references.…”
Section: Absence Of Lavrentiev Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 99%