2023
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1235269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crosstalk between septic shock and venous thromboembolism: a bioinformatics and immunoassay analysis

Zhishu Li,
Chaolan Wang,
Xu Zhang
et al.

Abstract: BackgroundHerein, we applied bioinformatics methods to analyze the crosstalk between septic shock (SS) and venous thromboembolism (VTE), focusing on the correlation with immune infiltrating cells.MethodsExpression data were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, including blood samples from SS patients (datasets GSE64457, GSE95233, and GSE57065) and VTE patients (GSE19151). We used the R package “limma” for differential expression analysis (p value<0.05,∣logFC∣≥1). Venn plots were gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with sepsis have a high risk of developing VTE, with an incidence ranging from 10.8-16.9% [1]. The reasons for the high risk of VTE in sepsis patients include severe systemic in ammatory response, immune imbalance, vascular endothelial injury, activation of thrombotic in ammatory pathways, disseminated intravascular coagulation and blood stasis [2]. The guidelines recommend active thrombosis prophylaxis for sepsis patients [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with sepsis have a high risk of developing VTE, with an incidence ranging from 10.8-16.9% [1]. The reasons for the high risk of VTE in sepsis patients include severe systemic in ammatory response, immune imbalance, vascular endothelial injury, activation of thrombotic in ammatory pathways, disseminated intravascular coagulation and blood stasis [2]. The guidelines recommend active thrombosis prophylaxis for sepsis patients [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%