1989
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/22/6/024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossover between field theories with short-range and long-range exchange or correlations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
127
0
3

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
127
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the analysis of Fisher et al [2], universality classes are parametrized by s, and the following three distinct regimes were identified: (a) The classical regime; the upper critical dimension is given by d u 2s, so that mean-field-type critical behavior occurs for s # d͞2. (b) The intermediate regime d͞2 , s , 2; here the critical exponents are continuous functions of s. (c) The shortrange regime; for s $ 2, the universal properties are those of the model with short-range interactions, e.g., between nearest neighbors only; thus one observes that, for d 3, van der Waals interactions (decaying as 1͞r 6 ) actually lie quite close to the boundary between regimes (b) and (c).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the analysis of Fisher et al [2], universality classes are parametrized by s, and the following three distinct regimes were identified: (a) The classical regime; the upper critical dimension is given by d u 2s, so that mean-field-type critical behavior occurs for s # d͞2. (b) The intermediate regime d͞2 , s , 2; here the critical exponents are continuous functions of s. (c) The shortrange regime; for s $ 2, the universal properties are those of the model with short-range interactions, e.g., between nearest neighbors only; thus one observes that, for d 3, van der Waals interactions (decaying as 1͞r 6 ) actually lie quite close to the boundary between regimes (b) and (c).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more serious objection was raised by Gusmão and Theumann [5] (but ignored in Ref. [6]), who argued that the parameter 2 2 s (i.e., 2a in the notation of Ref. [6]) is not a valid expansion parameter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the limit α → 1 presents no difficulties, the opposite limit α → 0 is far more subtle: we will see that, just below the upper critical dimension d c (α), two nontrivial renormalizations are required to render the α = 0 theory finite, in contrast to a single one if α is positive and of O(1), leading to an apparent discontinuity in the critical exponents. A similar situation arises in standard φ 4 -theory with long-ranged interactions [10]. There, however, the discontinuity is entirely spurious and can be removed: letting ε = d c (0) − d denote the distance from the upper critical dimension of the short-range theory, the key is to recognize [10] that there is a region of small α = O (ε), where a careful analysis of the RG flow reveals a smooth crossover between the α = 0 and the α = O (1) theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…A similar situation arises in standard φ 4 -theory with long-ranged interactions [10]. There, however, the discontinuity is entirely spurious and can be removed: letting ε = d c (0) − d denote the distance from the upper critical dimension of the short-range theory, the key is to recognize [10] that there is a region of small α = O (ε), where a careful analysis of the RG flow reveals a smooth crossover between the α = 0 and the α = O (1) theories. Thus, all universal scaling properties are shown to depend continuously on α and d. Here, in contrast, the limit α → 0 is even more intricate: while the short-range theory is controlled by two fixed points, only a single one remains in the long-range model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…At first sight it would seem that the generic propagator (18) allows for several choices for the bare propagator. Analysis of similar situations in the field theory of static critical phenomena has revealed, however, that the consistent way to proceed is to separate the fractional terms to interaction [11,12] …”
Section: Renormalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%