Crossover and rechallenge with pembrolizumab in recurrent patients from the EORTC 1325-MG/Keynote-054 phase 3 trial, pembrolizumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma.
Abstract:9500 Background: The phase 3 double-blind EORTC 1325/KEYNOTE-054 trial evaluated pembrolizumab (pembro) vs placebo in stage III cutaneous melanoma patients (pts) with complete resection of lymph nodes. Pembro improved RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.57) and DMFS (HR 0.60) (Eggermont, NEJM 2018, TLO 2021). In the pembro group, the incidence of immune related AE (irAE) grade 1-5 was 37%, and of grade 3-5 was 7%. We present the safety profile, response rate and PFS for the subset of pts who had a recurrence and crossed… Show more
“…Nine of these patients had unresectable stage IV disease and were evaluable for response. The activity was low with only one complete response (CR) (CR 1/9; SD 3/9; PD 5/ 9) and a median PFS of 4.1 months [14].…”
Section: Retreatment and Escalation After Progression And Recurrence In The Adjuvant Settingmentioning
Forty to 60% of patients with advanced or metastatic melanoma respond to firstline immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and half of all patients in the metastatic setting eventually progress. This review evaluated the latest long-term data from clinical trials. It also considered data from recent retrospective studies, as these address important questions for clinical practice. 'Retreatment' defined as 'repeated treatment with the same therapeutic class following relapse after adjuvant treatment has ended' and showed activity in selected patients with recurrence after regular completion of adjuvant PD-1 treatment. In melanoma patients with adjuvant PD-1 monotherapy who recur during adjuvant treatment, further treatment with PD-1 monotherapy seems to have no clinical utility, indicating the need for a therapy switch or escalation in these patients. Targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors and * For consistency, the compound names used (PD-1 inihibitors e.g. nivolumab and pembrolizumab and CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab) are reflected whenever possible. In pooled analyses, the use of 'PD-1 monotherapy' includes either approved treatment options (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) or unspecified substance use.
“…Nine of these patients had unresectable stage IV disease and were evaluable for response. The activity was low with only one complete response (CR) (CR 1/9; SD 3/9; PD 5/ 9) and a median PFS of 4.1 months [14].…”
Section: Retreatment and Escalation After Progression And Recurrence In The Adjuvant Settingmentioning
Forty to 60% of patients with advanced or metastatic melanoma respond to firstline immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and half of all patients in the metastatic setting eventually progress. This review evaluated the latest long-term data from clinical trials. It also considered data from recent retrospective studies, as these address important questions for clinical practice. 'Retreatment' defined as 'repeated treatment with the same therapeutic class following relapse after adjuvant treatment has ended' and showed activity in selected patients with recurrence after regular completion of adjuvant PD-1 treatment. In melanoma patients with adjuvant PD-1 monotherapy who recur during adjuvant treatment, further treatment with PD-1 monotherapy seems to have no clinical utility, indicating the need for a therapy switch or escalation in these patients. Targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors and * For consistency, the compound names used (PD-1 inihibitors e.g. nivolumab and pembrolizumab and CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab) are reflected whenever possible. In pooled analyses, the use of 'PD-1 monotherapy' includes either approved treatment options (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) or unspecified substance use.
“…Key parameters of adjuvant trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors or BRAF/MEK inhibitors that led to approvals. PD-1 in those who never received it[101]. The real measure of this crossover would be a comparison of the OS in those who were treated early in adjuvant compared to those treated later at relapse.…”
“…These patients started with adjuvant pembrolizumab after developing a recurrence during or after treatment with a placebo. This group has a 1-year RFS of ± 35% and it is remarkable that the patients with resectable stage III disease only barely seem to profit more from the treatment than the patients with unresectable stage III/IV disease [11]. The median follow-up time was 53 months in cohort B (interquartile range [IQR], 34–95 months) and 37 months (IQR, 35–40 months) in the EORTC1325/KEYNOTE-054 trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first outcomes of this group, which consists of a combination of patients with un- and resected stage III and IV disease, were presented on the ASCO annual meeting 2021: 32% of patients were relapse-free at 3 years after crossover treatment. Although stage III resected melanoma and stage III and IV unresected melanoma had a similar 3-year progression-free survival (PFS, 33% vs. 32%, respectively), the first did have a better median PFS (14 months vs. 8 months, respectively) [11]. Moreover, these results would seem to indicate a worse outcome than compared to the RFS of patients who were immediately randomized to pembrolizumab with a 3-year RFS of 64%.…”
We aimed to compare the relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients treated with adjuvant anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) therapy for a first diagnosis of stage III melanoma to patients treated after resection of the recurrences. Patients treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy after complete resection of stage III melanoma between September 2018 and January 2021, were included. Depending on when adjuvant anti-PD-1 treatment was initiated, patients were divided over 2 cohorts: for the first diagnosis (cohort A) or for a second or subsequent diagnosis (cohort B) of stage III melanoma. Clinical data and RFS were compared between cohorts. 66 patients were included: 37 in cohort A, 29 in cohort B. Median follow-up time from the start of adjuvant therapy was 21 months and 17 months in cohorts A and B, respectively. Significant differences in ulceration of the primary tumor (P = 0.032), stage according to the 7th AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer, P = 0.026) and type of metastatic involvement (P = 0.005) were found between cohorts. In cohorts A and B, 18 (49%) and 8 (28%) patients developed a recurrence and the 1-year RFS was 51% and 72%, respectively. In cohort B, RFS remained longer in the patients of which the interval between first diagnosis of stage III melanoma and start of adjuvant therapy was >48 months compared to ≤48 months (83% vs. 65%, P = 0.253). This study demonstrates that patients with recurrent stage III disease, not previously treated with adjuvant systemic therapy, may derive similar benefit to a first diagnosis of stage III patients if access to adjuvant therapy changes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.