2011
DOI: 10.1080/13594320903432315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossnational deviance in the workplace: Diverging impact of organizational commitment in Canada and Belgium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between individuals' perceptions of the fairness of job demands and rewards distribution and organizational deviance are consistent with findings from Skarlicki and Folger (1997) and Henle (2005). These studies suggest that when a relationship is perceived as unfair, an individual will react to reduce the felt tension to re-establish an internal equilibrium (Ménard et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relationship between individuals' perceptions of the fairness of job demands and rewards distribution and organizational deviance are consistent with findings from Skarlicki and Folger (1997) and Henle (2005). These studies suggest that when a relationship is perceived as unfair, an individual will react to reduce the felt tension to re-establish an internal equilibrium (Ménard et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research on employee deviance has highlighted the pervasiveness of wrongdoing acts at workplace amongst the employees (Appelbaum, Deguire, and Lay, 2005;Bennett and Robinson, 2000;Judge, Scott, and Ilies, 2006;Ménard, Brunet, Savoie, Van Daele, and Flament, 2011;O'Neill, Lewis, and Carswell, 2011) particularly from the Western scholars. Employee deviance is defined as an individual's voluntary behaviour that violates significant norms, and in doing so, threatens the well-being of an organization, its members, or both (Bennett and Robinson, 2000).…”
Section: Employee Deviancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ces résultats suggèrent de nouvelles pistes interprétatives concernant l'impact des facteurs organisationnels sur les jugements et les conduites déviantes au travail. Par exemple, on sait que les distances psychologiques dépendent des structures organisationnelles (Poppe, 2003 ;Van Dijke & Poppe, 2003 ;, ces dernières ayant un impact sur les comportements antisociaux au travail (Desrumaux-Zagrodnicki, Lemoine & Mahon, 2004 ;Flaherty & Moss, 2007 ;Ménard, Brunet, Savoie, Van Daele & Flament, 2007). D'autres variables comme le climat, la culture ou la perception de justice organisationnelle pourraient elles aussi être reliées à l'élaboration des distances psychologiques vis-à-vis des conduites au travail.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…However, Ménard et al (2011) revealed that at the high levels of continuance commitment (CC) and NC (but not at the low levels), individuals from low power-distant country (Canada) displayed more interpersonal deviance compared to those from high power-distant country (Belgium). Future studies are needed to enrich our understanding about undesirable consequences of increasing NC and CC among employees in certain cultures.…”
Section: Organizational Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 94%