Crossing the line: When does the involvement of human subjects in testing of engineering capstone design projects require oversight by an IRB?

Watts, R; Brightman, Andrew O.

doi:10.18260/1-2--28091

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 22 publications

(22 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is not an easy question to answer, and there are myriad considerations including how exactly you define "human subjects research" and in fact whether the discussion should be limited to only "research" (e.g. [61]). Rather than theorizing on the definitions and the ethics considerations involved, we decided to elicit opinions straight from the horse's mouth.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

"We do not appreciate being experimented on": Developer and Researcher Views on the Ethics of Experiments on Open-Source Projects

Feitelson¹

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A tenet of open source software development is to accept contributions from users-developers (typically after appropriate vetting). But should this include interventions done as part of research on open source development? Following an incident in which buggy code was submitted to the Linux kernel to see whether it would be caught, we conduct a survey among open source developers and empirical software engineering researchers to see what behaviors they think are acceptable. This covers two main issues: the use of publicly accessible information, and conducting active experimentation. The survey had 224 respondents. The results indicate that open-source developers are largely open to research, provided it is done transparently. In other words, many would agree to experiments on open-source projects if the subjects were notified and provided informed consent, and in special cases also if only the project leaders agree. While researchers generally hold similar opinions, they sometimes fail to appreciate certain nuances in the stand of developers. Examples include observing license restrictions on publishing open-source code and safeguarding the code.Conversely, researchers seem to be more concerned than developers about privacy issues. Based on these results, it is recommended that open source repositories and projects include research considerations in their access guidelines, and that researchers take care to ask permission also when not formally required to do so. We note too that the open source community wants to be heard, so professional societies and IRBs should consult with them when formulating ethics codes.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

"We do not appreciate being experimented on": Developer and Researcher Views on the Ethics of Experiments on Open-Source Projects

Feitelson¹

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Crossing the line: When does the involvement of human subjects in testing of engineering capstone design projects require oversight by an IRB?

Cited by 1 publication

References 22 publications

"We do not appreciate being experimented on": Developer and Researcher Views on the Ethics of Experiments on Open-Source Projects

"We do not appreciate being experimented on": Developer and Researcher Views on the Ethics of Experiments on Open-Source Projects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About