Crossing borders: the intersectional marginalisation of Bulgarian Muslim trans*immigrant sex workers in Berlin

Abstract

Bordering situates immigrant sex workers at the margins of an already marginalised industry and naturalises the legal conditions of their dispossession and precarity. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in Berlin, we offer a situated intersectional analysis of the everyday bordering experiences of Muslim trans*immigrant sex workers from Bulgaria (hereafter TISWs). Focusing on three interactional contextsminority belonging within EU and German politics, encounters with medicolegal institutions, and the new sex work regulation in Germanyour study demonstrates both that everyday bordering experiences derive not solely from national border enforcement and citizenship regulation but also from intersectional sociocultural barriers imposed by non-state actors, while the internal bordering practices of the German state exacerbate the exclusion and marginalisation of sex/gender transgressive people and sex work. We conclude that despite their physical existence as EU citizens in Berlin, TISWs' everyday bordering experiences require a more nuanced understanding of intersectional systems of oppression which postpones TISWs' arrival in Berlin indefinitely.

Promoting Human Rights standards for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people from the perspective of International law

“…However, research has proven that parenting ability is not related to sexual orientation, and parental commitment comes from their love for their child or their educational background, but not from their sexual orientation. Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Canada, South Africa, Scandinavian countries, the United Kingdom, the fourteen states of the United States of America, as well as other European countries such as Andorra, Spain, and the Netherlands which allow married gay couples to adopt; in other countries such as Germany, Finland, Israel, Greenland and the Australian state of Tasmania, it is legal to adopt stepchildren, meaning that you can adopt your spouse's biological child (Altay et al, 2021). Adoption rights claims may also be legitimized by the research of Lawrence Kurdek, who in 1977 initiated a comparative social research study of 239 heterosexual couples, 79 male gay couples, and 51 lesbian couples.…”

Introduction: marginalisation in law, policy and society

“…The existence of marginal spaces at the edges of society and their populations are important subjects of legal scholarship, and much ethnographic research has been crucial in shedding light on what marginalisation looks or feels like for marginalised people (Altay et al ., 2021). The critical edge that such research often brings to the subject derives from the same etymological roots described above regarding the inherent provisionality and revisability of the margin and the margin al .…”

Doing Digital Migration Studies:

“…There is a growing scholarly interest in understanding how border regimes and migration patterns intersect with normativities relating to sexuality and gender identities, and how migrants from outside the landscapes of hetero-and cisnormativity cope with a world shaped by racist antiimmigration policies (Altay et al, 2020;Luibhéid & Chávez, 2020). Queer migration scholarship, as Eithne Luibhéid (2008) observes, has not only drawn on but also enriched several bodies of research, including feminist, race, postcolonial and globalization studies.…”