2016
DOI: 10.1190/geo2015-0677.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crosshole seismic tomography with cross-firing geometry

Abstract: We have developed a case study of crosshole seismic tomography with a cross-firing geometry in which seismic sources were placed in two vertical boreholes alternatingly and receiver arrays were placed in another vertical borehole. There are two crosshole seismic data sets in a conventional sense. These two data sets are used jointly in seismic tomography. Because the local sediment is dominated by periodic, flat, thin layers, there is seismic anisotropy with different velocities in the vertical and horizontal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the detection technology of karst caves, a great deal of researches have been done to accurately predict the hazardous geological conditions during tunnel construction in karst terrains. Nowadays, the commonly used detection technologies mainly include two categories: destructive methods such as the Core Drilling and Percussion Drilling [4] and nondestructive methods including the Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) [5][6][7], Electrical Resistance Topography (ERT) [8,9], Tunnel Seismic Prediction (TSP) [10][11][12], crosshole seismic Computed Tomography (CT) [13,14], and Transient Electromagnetic Method (TEM) [8,9,15]. For example, Gómez-Ortiz and Martín-Crespo had applied shallow and noninvasive geophysical techniques, that is, GPR and ERT, to ascertain the existence and characteristics of cavities and galleries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the detection technology of karst caves, a great deal of researches have been done to accurately predict the hazardous geological conditions during tunnel construction in karst terrains. Nowadays, the commonly used detection technologies mainly include two categories: destructive methods such as the Core Drilling and Percussion Drilling [4] and nondestructive methods including the Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) [5][6][7], Electrical Resistance Topography (ERT) [8,9], Tunnel Seismic Prediction (TSP) [10][11][12], crosshole seismic Computed Tomography (CT) [13,14], and Transient Electromagnetic Method (TEM) [8,9,15]. For example, Gómez-Ortiz and Martín-Crespo had applied shallow and noninvasive geophysical techniques, that is, GPR and ERT, to ascertain the existence and characteristics of cavities and galleries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This acoustic wave equation is defined by two anisotropic parameters e and d measuring the difference between two axes of the elliptic wavefront and the deviation from a perfect elliptical shape, respectively (Thomsen 1986). In the context of seismic waveform inversion, Pratt and Shipp (1999) and Rao and Wang (2011) use an acoustic wave equation defined by a single anisotropic parameter e. Rao et al (2016) provide the derivation of this wave equation with a single anisotropic parameter. In this paper, we adopt the acoustic wave equation with two anisotropic parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%