2007
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.200600372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossflow Ultrafiltration of Binary Biomolecule Mixture: Analysis of Permeate Flux, Cake Resistance and Sieving Coefficient

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the effects of hydrodynamic conditions on the permeate flux, cake resistance and sieving coefficient in a crossflow ultrafiltration process separating biomolecules of different molecular weights. A binary mixture of L-phenylalanine (L-phe) and lipase was ultrafiltered through a hydrophobic polyether sulphone (PES) membrane with 10 kDa molecular weight cut-off. The changes in permeate flux, cake layer resistance and observed sieving coefficient with different transmembran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5(b) that cake resistance significantly decreases with increasing cross-flow velocity. Similar results were also reported by Salgin [30]. When cross-flow velocity increased from 3.86 to 7.72 m/s under constant transmembrane pressure of 2.3 bar, RC70PP showed less pronounced flux improvement than the other membranes.…”
Section: Influence Of Cross-flow Velocitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…5(b) that cake resistance significantly decreases with increasing cross-flow velocity. Similar results were also reported by Salgin [30]. When cross-flow velocity increased from 3.86 to 7.72 m/s under constant transmembrane pressure of 2.3 bar, RC70PP showed less pronounced flux improvement than the other membranes.…”
Section: Influence Of Cross-flow Velocitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The main factors that influence fouling are the hydrodynamics of the separation process and the interfacial interactions between protein–membrane and protein–protein. Interactions between charged molecules and membrane surfaces may be classified into the following major contributions: electrostatic interaction between the protein and the surfaces, and hydrophobic dehydration of various parts of the protein molecules, structural rearrangements in the protein molecule and van der Waals interactions 1–3…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 and 5, one can see that J increases linearly with increasing transmembrane pressure. This means that a gel layer of retained PQ6 on the membrane surface does not form in this range of PQ6 concentration [7,28]. A transmembrane pressure of 60 kPa was used in the other experiments since the experimental system was controlled easily at this pressure.…”
Section: Effects Of Pmmr and Ph On Rmentioning
confidence: 99%