1994
DOI: 10.1080/01496399408002185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossflow Surfactant-Based Ultrafiltration of Heavy Metals from Waste Streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cellulose acetate membranes for treatment of leather effluent showed a permeate flux of 33-42.0 Lm -2 h -1 along with separation of suspended and dissolved solids, chlorides, sulphate, oil and grease, ammonical nitrogen, potassium and sodium by more than 80% (Jarvis and Wagener, 1995;Mahendran et al, 2000). PES UF flat membranes on the industrial scale are considered to be technically and economical feasible for treatment of leather and distillery effluents (Huang et al, 1994). Ultrafiltration has wide application in the recovery of milk solids (Briao and Tavares, 2012) and disposal of effluents from dairy waste water (Namvar Mahboub and Pakizeh, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cellulose acetate membranes for treatment of leather effluent showed a permeate flux of 33-42.0 Lm -2 h -1 along with separation of suspended and dissolved solids, chlorides, sulphate, oil and grease, ammonical nitrogen, potassium and sodium by more than 80% (Jarvis and Wagener, 1995;Mahendran et al, 2000). PES UF flat membranes on the industrial scale are considered to be technically and economical feasible for treatment of leather and distillery effluents (Huang et al, 1994). Ultrafiltration has wide application in the recovery of milk solids (Briao and Tavares, 2012) and disposal of effluents from dairy waste water (Namvar Mahboub and Pakizeh, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) has been used for the ionic pollutants from aqueous streams [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. It combines the high rejection of reverse osmosis with the higher flow rate of ultra filtration.…”
Section: Presented At the Euromed 2004 Conference On Desalination Strmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, this may increase the cost of the separation process and/or make the process effluent unacceptable on environmental grounds (Aoudia et al 2003). Huang et al (1994) reported that two important parameters controlled the removal efficiency of metals: surfactant concentration and surfactant to metal molar ratio (S/M ratio). To achieve maximum metal removal efficiency (>99% for most of the metals investigated), the surfactant concentration has to be higher than the CMC of the surfactant (Fillipi et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%