2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossed characterisation of polymer-layered silicate (PLS) nanocomposite morphology: TEM, X-ray diffraction, rheology and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance measurements

Abstract: ArticleCrossed characterisation of polymer layered silicate (PLS) nanocomposite morphology: TEM, X ray diffraction, rheology and solid state nuclear magnetic resonance measurements SAMYN, F, BOURBIGOT, S, JAMA, C, BELLAYER, S, NAZARE, S, Hull, T Richard, CASTROVINCI, A, FINA, A and CAMINO, G Available at http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/1134/ SAMYN, F, BOURBIGOT, S, JAMA, C, BELLAYER, S, NAZARE, S, Hull, T Richard, CASTROVINCI, A, FINA, A and CAMINO, G (2008) Abstract:As the nanocomposite properties dramatically de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, NC-L and NC-H nanocomposites have low shear thinning behavior compared to results reported elsewhere [39]. Even if the dispersion is improved in the case of NC-H compared to NC-L, no or few exfoliation has occured and the extent of intercalation is limited compared to the dispersion commonly obtained in the case of PA6 nanocomposites [40][41][42][43]. In order to evaluate the effect of the injection-molding induced dispersion of clay, the mechanical properties of the nanocomposites NC-L and NC-H were measured and compared to neat PP.…”
Section: Results and Discussion 41 Effect Of Processing Conditions mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Moreover, NC-L and NC-H nanocomposites have low shear thinning behavior compared to results reported elsewhere [39]. Even if the dispersion is improved in the case of NC-H compared to NC-L, no or few exfoliation has occured and the extent of intercalation is limited compared to the dispersion commonly obtained in the case of PA6 nanocomposites [40][41][42][43]. In order to evaluate the effect of the injection-molding induced dispersion of clay, the mechanical properties of the nanocomposites NC-L and NC-H were measured and compared to neat PP.…”
Section: Results and Discussion 41 Effect Of Processing Conditions mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Generally, to have a better view of the microstructure of nanocomposites, synergistic combinations of different characterization techniques are useful. A number of nanocomposite characterization methods are available, which include differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetric analysis, transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction [117,118,145], nuclear magnetic resonance [92,155], IR spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy [44], X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy [107], dielectric relaxation spectroscopy [111], atomic force microscopy [2,122]. In addition, some of the techniques are used to evaluate the properties of nanocomposites, like mechanical performance [136,177], barrier performance [21, 168], thermal properties [37,115].…”
Section: Characterization Of Nanocompositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enhancement of material properties because of nanoparticles addition has usually been analysed using a combination of morphological (X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM)), mechanical (tensile testing) and possibly rheological (rotational rheometry) measurements [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Using 2-5% of clay, significant improvement of material properties can be reached: high elastic modulus, tensile strength, thermal resistivity, low gas and liquid permeability, reduced flammability [18] and improved rheological properties compared to the unfilled polymer matrix [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. High reinforcement due to addition of the layered silicates results from their large surface area (specific surface of montmorillonite is about 700-800 m 2 /g) [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%