Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3038912.3052575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross View Link Prediction by Learning Noise-resilient Representation Consensus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, [54] embeds a graph with discrete node attribute value (e.g., the atomic number in a molecule). In contrast, [4] represents the node attribute as a continuous high-dimensional vector (e.g., user attribute features in social networks). [55] deals with both discrete and continuous attributes for nodes and edges.…”
Section: Graph With Auxiliary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, [54] embeds a graph with discrete node attribute value (e.g., the atomic number in a molecule). In contrast, [4] represents the node attribute as a continuous high-dimensional vector (e.g., user attribute features in social networks). [55] deals with both discrete and continuous attributes for nodes and edges.…”
Section: Graph With Auxiliary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes multiple techniques are combined in one study. For example, [4] learns edge-based embedding via minimizing the margin-based ranking loss (Sec Apart from the introduced five categories of techniques, there exist other approaches. [95] presents embedding of a graph by its distances to prototype graphs.…”
Section: Hybrid Techniques and Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To show the underlying mechanism of the link prediction phase, we first assume that the feature representation G t of the dynamic attributed network until time stamp t is available (which actually not). The original feature representation G t could be very noisy, containing a certain amount of noisy and irrelevant attributes which may degrade the link prediction performance [32,51]. On top of that, the link information in networks may also be noisy and even erroneous from a network analysis perspective [16].…”
Section: Infer Missing Links With Sketching Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can analyze data regarding social network involvement to help improve networks and user experiences. This may explain why there are increasing interests from both industry and academia in personalizing services to users' interests, behaviors and attributes [14] [5], detecting communities [10,33], recommending products [23,43] or friends [12,[34][35][36]. However, the network representation, e.g., adjacency matrix, is usually high-dimensional and spare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%