2022
DOI: 10.2196/33577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Verification of COVID-19 Information Obtained From Unofficial Social Media Accounts and Associated Changes in Health Behaviors: Web-Based Questionnaire Study Among Chinese Netizens

Abstract: Background As social media platforms have become significant sources of information during the pandemic, a significant volume of both factual and inaccurate information related to the prevention of COVID-19 has been disseminated through social media. Thus, disparities in COVID-19 information verification across populations have the potential to promote the dissemination of misinformation among clustered groups of people with similar characteristics. Objective … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, people’s use of social media increased significantly during the Corona-virus disease 2019 pandemic. However, experts’ advice was the most positive source of information [ 28 ], and although social media can be used to disseminate health improvement measures and promote the adoption of healthier behaviour patterns [ 29 ], information on social media is sometimes misleading [ 28 ]. Limited health information and/or online literacy may lead to misunderstanding when assessing medical data on the web [ 30 ], which can influence individuals to make harmful or counterproductive behavioural changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, people’s use of social media increased significantly during the Corona-virus disease 2019 pandemic. However, experts’ advice was the most positive source of information [ 28 ], and although social media can be used to disseminate health improvement measures and promote the adoption of healthier behaviour patterns [ 29 ], information on social media is sometimes misleading [ 28 ]. Limited health information and/or online literacy may lead to misunderstanding when assessing medical data on the web [ 30 ], which can influence individuals to make harmful or counterproductive behavioural changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 43 Even netizens with high health literacy may lack e-health literacy. 44 Different diseases often have similar symptoms, and if the diagnosis searched by patients with one of their symptoms is wrong, it is bound to be ineffective to obtain the relevant knowledge of the “disease”. Some platforms allow non-professional individuals to upload information, 45 there are differences in the quality of different social media information, 46 and there may be pseudo-health information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it is necessary to guide parents not to believe reports about sequelae from unknown sources on the Internet blindly and refer to information from sufficient scientific evidence [44,45]. (3) In terms of the social acceptance of COVID-19 infection, infectivity of recovered COVID-19 patients and relapse cases should be publicly declared; however, this results in the same problem of resuming work and study as the original infection.…”
Section: Promote Public Scientific Cognition Through Health Education...mentioning
confidence: 99%