Cross-Validation of Aerobic Capacity Prediction Models in Adolescents

Burns, Ryan D.; Hannon, James C.; Brusseau, Timothy A.; Eisenman, Patricia A.; Saint‐Maurice, Pedro F.; Welk, Greg; Mahar, Matthew T.

doi:10.1123/pes.2014-0175

Cited by 25 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Some grey literature sources were not included because they were published later in a journal paper, e.g. [ 144 – 146 ]. From the Cureton’s et al [ 51 ] study the correlation coefficient with the only performance score was not included because the data came from the sum of some samples that had been reported in other journal papers [ 49 , 50 , 96 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Criterion-Related Validity of the Distance- and Time-Based Walk/Run Field Tests for Estimating Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThe main purpose of the present meta-analysis was to examine the criterion-related validity of the distance- and time-based walk/run tests for estimating cardiorespiratory fitness among apparently healthy children and adults.Materials and MethodsRelevant studies were searched from seven electronic bibliographic databases up to August 2015 and through other sources. The Hunter-Schmidt’s psychometric meta-analysis approach was conducted to estimate the population criterion-related validity of the following walk/run tests: 5,000 m, 3 miles, 2 miles, 3,000 m, 1.5 miles, 1 mile, 1,000 m, ½ mile, 600 m, 600 yd, ¼ mile, 15 min, 12 min, 9 min, and 6 min.ResultsFrom the 123 included studies, a total of 200 correlation values were analyzed. The overall results showed that the criterion-related validity of the walk/run tests for estimating maximum oxygen uptake ranged from low to moderate (rp = 0.42–0.79), with the 1.5 mile (rp = 0.79, 0.73–0.85) and 12 min walk/run tests (rp = 0.78, 0.72–0.83) having the higher criterion-related validity for distance- and time-based field tests, respectively. The present meta-analysis also showed that sex, age and maximum oxygen uptake level do not seem to affect the criterion-related validity of the walk/run tests.ConclusionsWhen the evaluation of an individual’s maximum oxygen uptake attained during a laboratory test is not feasible, the 1.5 mile and 12 min walk/run tests represent useful alternatives for estimating cardiorespiratory fitness. As in the assessment with any physical fitness field test, evaluators must be aware that the performance score of the walk/run field tests is simply an estimation and not a direct measure of cardiorespiratory fitness.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Criterion-Related Validity of the Distance- and Time-Based Walk/Run Field Tests for Estimating Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…If the student twice failed to reach the other floor marker within the allotted time frame, the test was terminated. Because estimated VO 2 Peak relates stronger to cardio-metabolic health than field test performance scores, PACER laps were converted to estimated VO 2 Peak using a validated prediction equation currently used by the FITNESSGRAM battery (Burns et al, 2015). The derived VO 2 Peak score was used as a covariate in the proceeding analysis.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Muscular strength and endurance and cardio-metabolic health in disadvantaged Hispanic children from the U.S.

Burns

Brusseau

2017

Preventive Medicine Reports

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The predictive relationship between muscular strength and endurance and cardio-metabolic health, independent from aerobic fitness, is not clear in disadvantaged Hispanic children. The purpose of this study was to examine the predictive relationship between muscular strength and endurance and clustered cardio-metabolic risk, controlling for aerobic fitness, in Hispanic children from low-income schools. Participants were 320 Hispanic children (Mean age = 10.1 ± 1.1 years; 164 girls, 156 boys) recruited during the 2014–2015 and 2015–2016 academic years from five low-income schools from the state of Utah in the U.S. Muscular strength and endurance was assessed using the push-up and curl-up tests and estimated VO2 Peak was calculated from the Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run. A clustered metabolic syndrome composite score (MetS) was calculated from cardio-metabolic health measurements consisting of HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, waist circumference, blood glucose, and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Multi-level general linear mixed effects models were used to examine the predictive relationship between muscular strength and endurance and MetS, controlling for the effect of aerobic fitness and the clustering of children within classrooms and schools. Children who were in the middle and upper tertiles for muscular strength and endurance associated with a lower (more favorable) MetS score (middle tertile: β = − 2.59, 95% C.I. [− 4.23, − 0.95], p < 0.05; upper tertile: β = − 1.57, 95% C.I. [− 3.20, − 0.16], p < 0.05). The results suggest that higher levels of muscular strength and endurance relate to lower cardio-metabolic risk, independent of aerobic fitness, in Hispanic children from low-income schools.

show abstract

“…On the other hand, a significant association between the time to complete 1600 m and CRF was worth extra attention. The studies (Burns et al, 2015;Pober, Freedson, Kline, McInnis, & Rippe, 2002) indicated that the time to complete 1600 m was significantly negatively related with CRF. The studies indicated that higher-CRF individuals had higher neurocognitive function, shorter reaction time and more accurate response (Chaddock et al, 2010;Dupuy et al, 2015), which might benefit in elevating academic performance.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Health-Related Physical Fitness and Academic Performance in College Students

Yang¹,

Tsao²

2020

APE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Whether cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and physical fitness affect academic performance in college first-year students is a concerning issue. Therefore, the goal of this study was to examine the relationship between academic performance and CRF and the components of physical fitness in college first-year students. A total of 98 college first-year students (female: 30, male: 68) participated in this study. The CRF was measured using a gas analyzer on a treadmill and physical fitness included body mass index, sit-up in one minute, standing long jump, sit-and-reach, 800 (female) and 1600-m (male) run/walk. The two assessments were scheduled by an interval of 7-10 days. The grade point average (GPA) in formal grade report was provided by each participant after the completion of the first academic year. The data were analyzed by an independent t-test and the relationships between variables were analyzed by Pearson product-moment correlation. The results displayed that males were significantly higher than females in CRF (p < 0.05). For physical fitness, the BMI, sit-up in one minute, standing long jump were significantly higher in males than in females. However, females were significantly higher than males in the number of sit-and-reach (p < 0.05). For academic performance, the GPA displayed similar between different genders. After regression analyses, the CRF was significantly related with academic performance and explained 56% of the variance for GPA in male college freshmen. However, neither CRF nor the components of physical fitness showed any significant relationship with academic performance in females. In conclusion, the CRF accounted for the variance of academic performance in male. However, a similar result was not found in the female part.

show abstract

Cross-Validation of Aerobic Capacity Prediction Models in Adolescents

Cited by 25 publications

References 0 publications

Criterion-Related Validity of the Distance- and Time-Based Walk/Run Field Tests for Estimating Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Criterion-Related Validity of the Distance- and Time-Based Walk/Run Field Tests for Estimating Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Muscular strength and endurance and cardio-metabolic health in disadvantaged Hispanic children from the U.S.

Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Health-Related Physical Fitness and Academic Performance in College Students

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About