2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2202.00488
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross Validation for Rare Events

Abstract: We derive sanity-check bounds for the cross-validation (CV) estimate of the generalization risk for learning algorithms dedicated to extreme or rare events. We consider classification on extreme regions of the covariate space, a problem analyzed in Jalalzai et al. 2018. The risk is then a probability of error conditional to the norm of the covariate vector exceeding a high quantile.Establishing sanity-check bounds consist in recovering bounds regarding the CV estimate that are of the same nature as the ones re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The VQ conducted in this study can further be improved by considering the rare-event theory. The penalized maximum likelihood (PML)-based logistic model, 47 cross-validation (CV), 48 application of deep reinforcement learning techniques, 49 and other methods 50 are being studied to improve the estimation and validation of rare events. In the future, it will be necessary to conduct additional research on improving VQ accuracy considering rare events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VQ conducted in this study can further be improved by considering the rare-event theory. The penalized maximum likelihood (PML)-based logistic model, 47 cross-validation (CV), 48 application of deep reinforcement learning techniques, 49 and other methods 50 are being studied to improve the estimation and validation of rare events. In the future, it will be necessary to conduct additional research on improving VQ accuracy considering rare events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%