1974
DOI: 10.1093/geronj/29.2.190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Validation and Methodological Extension of the Stockton Geriatric Rating Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We encountered numerous methodogic problems with this population, but are not alone, in that the difficulties of assessing geriatric populations has been well documented by others (4, 5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We encountered numerous methodogic problems with this population, but are not alone, in that the difficulties of assessing geriatric populations has been well documented by others (4, 5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The Stockton GRS has undergone numerous reliability studies and has reported correlations over .80 between a principal rater and registered nurses, nurses aides, and psychiatric assistants (Taylor & Bloom 1974).…”
Section: Instruments Commonly Associated With Geriatric Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%