2000
DOI: 10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1112::aid-tea5>3.3.co;2-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross‐time attitudes, concept formation, and achievement in college freshman physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are: focusing the class on conceptual understanding, conducting labs that address students' beliefs about the world, discussing currently relevant science, discussing the benefits of being a scientist, and encouraging students to take science classes. The first finding, that a conceptual understanding focus is positively related to physics identity, dovetails with a host of other research that finds a link between physics conceptual understanding and performance (e.g., Eryilmaz, 2002;Hazari et al, 2007;Willson, Ackerman, & Malave, 2000), reasoning ability (e.g., Cavallo et al, 2004;Chin & Brown, 2000), self-efficacy (e.g., Cavallo et al, 2004), and interest (e.g., Otero & Gray, 2008). These latter domains are embedded in our theoretical framework for physics identity.…”
Section: Research Question 2: Predictors Of Physics Identity-high Schsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…They are: focusing the class on conceptual understanding, conducting labs that address students' beliefs about the world, discussing currently relevant science, discussing the benefits of being a scientist, and encouraging students to take science classes. The first finding, that a conceptual understanding focus is positively related to physics identity, dovetails with a host of other research that finds a link between physics conceptual understanding and performance (e.g., Eryilmaz, 2002;Hazari et al, 2007;Willson, Ackerman, & Malave, 2000), reasoning ability (e.g., Cavallo et al, 2004;Chin & Brown, 2000), self-efficacy (e.g., Cavallo et al, 2004), and interest (e.g., Otero & Gray, 2008). These latter domains are embedded in our theoretical framework for physics identity.…”
Section: Research Question 2: Predictors Of Physics Identity-high Schsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Here we examine male and female students' motivational characteristics longitudinally, i.e., over the course an introductory physics sequence. We note that there have been relatively few longitudinal studies of students' motivation in physics [16,[93][94][95][96][97][98]. In the study by Bates et al [93], researchers used the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) to investigate how undergraduate physics students' attitudes changed over a period of three years.…”
Section: Longitudinal Studies Of Factors Related To Students' Motimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has also been continual interest on sex differences in science achievement (Blickenstaff, 2005;Greenfield, 1996;Osborne, Simon, Collins, 2003;Turner & Lindsay, 2003;Willson, Ackerman, & Malave, 2000). In college chemistry, Turner & Lindsay (2003) looked at sex differences in cognitive factors (ACT, spatial-visualization, introductory chemistry scores) and noncognitive factors (confidence, anxiety, motivation, usefulness) related to organic chemistry achievement.…”
Section: Affective Domain In Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%