2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11803-015-0048-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-spectral recognition method of bridge deck aerodynamic admittance function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hejlesen M. M. [29] estimated the aerodynamic admittance of bridge sections by mesh-free vortex method and confirmed its feasibility by comparing to available wind tunnel data. Zhao L. [30] proposed a new identification algorithm about the admittance function and validated it by a comparison between the numerical calculation and wind tunnel tests. Hua X. G. [31] developed an improved perturbation method for the statistical identification of structural parameters by using the measured modal parameters with randomness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hejlesen M. M. [29] estimated the aerodynamic admittance of bridge sections by mesh-free vortex method and confirmed its feasibility by comparing to available wind tunnel data. Zhao L. [30] proposed a new identification algorithm about the admittance function and validated it by a comparison between the numerical calculation and wind tunnel tests. Hua X. G. [31] developed an improved perturbation method for the statistical identification of structural parameters by using the measured modal parameters with randomness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) may be exceeded as shown by Ma et al (2013), where the 2D admittance was determined to be dependent on the turbulent characteristics of a single harmonic. This requires further investigations (Zhao and Ge, 2015). For lower reduced velocities (V r 5) however, the numerical noise in the aerodynamic admittance based on random free-stream is more significant and there is a higher deviation w.r.t.…”
Section: Random Free-stream Turbulence: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the 2D linear unsteady model, the aerodynamic forces for a stationary body are obtained as a linear superposition of the static and buffeting forces due to mean wind and incident fluctuations, respectively (Chen and Kareem, 2002). Further, the dependence on the turbulent characteristics in terms of intensity and the co-acting of the fluctuating components is not considered within this aerodynamic model (Ma et al, 2013;Matsuda et al, 1999;Zhao and Ge, 2015), as well as the local turbulence and vortex shedding effects. The aerodynamic forces per unit span then yield the following:…”
Section: Complex Aerodynamic Admittancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this method is not affected by the geographical environment, accurate models must be built, and the cost can be extremely expensive. With the development of theoretical studies and computer technology, simulation experiments have been increasingly used to study the effects of various factors on bridge components at the initial stage of the research work to reduce the number of field measurements and tunnel tests [17,18]. Field measurements and tunnel tests are usually used for final validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%