2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.26.568769
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-species and tissue imputation of species-level DNA methylation samples across mammalian species

Emily Maciejewski,
Steve Horvath,
Jason Ernst

Abstract: DNA methylation data offers valuable insights into various aspects of mammalian biology. The recent introduction and large-scale application of the mammalian methylation array has significantly expanded the availability of such data across conserved sites in many mammalian species. In our study, we consider 13,245 samples profiled on this array encompassing 348 species and 59 tissues from 746 species-tissue combinations. While having some coverage of many different species and tissue types, this data captures … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While some research has looked at estimating methylation across tissues [13], algorithms that do this without having access to multiple tissue data are still unavailable. While some research has looked at estimating methylation across tissues [13] or predicting species' average methylation across tissues [14], algorithms are not available for individual level prediction yet or without needing access to multiple tissue data. Moreover, simply measuring these tissues and applying current DNAm biomarkers may not yield meaningful insights, a point underscored by researchers who advise caution when using methylation markers from surrogate tissues [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some research has looked at estimating methylation across tissues [13], algorithms that do this without having access to multiple tissue data are still unavailable. While some research has looked at estimating methylation across tissues [13] or predicting species' average methylation across tissues [14], algorithms are not available for individual level prediction yet or without needing access to multiple tissue data. Moreover, simply measuring these tissues and applying current DNAm biomarkers may not yield meaningful insights, a point underscored by researchers who advise caution when using methylation markers from surrogate tissues [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%