1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0278-4343(98)00075-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-shelf changes in phytoplankton community composition in the Gulf of Mexico (Texas shelf/slope): the use of plant pigments as biomarkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
11
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
11
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the contribution of chlorophyll c1c2, fucoxanthin, and diadinoxanthin was increased in the neritic stations, which reflects an increase in the relative abundance of diatoms, dinoflagellates, and other eukaryotic phytoplankton. This also agrees with previous studies in the GOM which showed an increase in diatom abundance inshore (Lambert et al 1999). Molar C:N and δ 15 N values measured in neritic water masses were similar to those measured from POM collected from the Mississippi River, suggesting that the presence of freshwater fueled the production of eukaryotic phytoplankton.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, the contribution of chlorophyll c1c2, fucoxanthin, and diadinoxanthin was increased in the neritic stations, which reflects an increase in the relative abundance of diatoms, dinoflagellates, and other eukaryotic phytoplankton. This also agrees with previous studies in the GOM which showed an increase in diatom abundance inshore (Lambert et al 1999). Molar C:N and δ 15 N values measured in neritic water masses were similar to those measured from POM collected from the Mississippi River, suggesting that the presence of freshwater fueled the production of eukaryotic phytoplankton.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…3, Table 3). DIN concentrations were at the lower end of the typical range of values measured in the GOM at the neritic and oceanic stations (Lambert et al 1999, Quigg et al 2011). Furthermore, NO 3 − concen trations were below the limit of detection in all samples, and DIN:P ratios indicated that both envi ronments were N limited.…”
Section: Freshwater Influencementioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…La muestra se homogeneiza mediante ultrasonidos durante 40 s a una potencia aproximada de 200 W con un 48 sonicador (homogeneizador de ultrasonidos), modelo SONOPULS HD200 (Bandelin), con una micropunta de 6 mm de diámetro. Se deja extraer durante 12 horas a 4ºC en la oscuridad (Lambert et al, 1999).…”
Section: Extracciónunclassified
“…La muestra se homogeneiza mediante ultrasonidos durante 40 s a una potencia aproximada de 200 W con un 48 sonicador (homogeneizador de ultrasonidos), modelo SONOPULS HD200 (Bandelin), con una micropunta de 6 mm de diámetro. Se deja extraer durante 12 horas a 4ºC en la oscuridad (Lambert et al, 1999).Posteriormente, el extracto se filtra con un filtro de jeringa PTFE de 17 mm y 0.2 µm de poro. El extracto se vierte directamente a viales de vidrio ámbar, donde se conserva hasta su análisis.…”
unclassified