Cross-sections of symplectic Stiefel manifolds

Sigrist, François; Suter, Ulrich W.

doi:10.1090/s0002-9947-1973-0326728-8

Cited by 19 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 12 publications

(5 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the papers [3,5,12,18,19,23] the problem of when the structure group G n in one of the fibrations (1.1)-(1.3) can be reduced to a group G = SU(k) or Sp(k) via a standard inclusion G → G n was solved and the results were expressed in terms of complex and quaternionic James numbers in a way similar to the result quoted above. The following theorem can be regarded as a generalization of these results.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

$G$-Structures on Spheres

Čadek

Crabb

2006

Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper deals with the problem of determining those groups G and the homomorphisms ρ to which the structure group G n in the fibrations above can be reduced. The problem has been solved in many interesting special cases. Considering standard inclusions ρ : G = G k → G n we get the famous problem on sections of Stiefel manifolds over spheres resolved in [1, 3, 5, 23]. The other standard inclusions SU(k) → SO(n), Sp(k) → SO(n) and Sp(k) → SU(n) are dealt with in [12], [18] and [19], respectively. In these cases the question was to find a minimal standard subgroup to which G n can be reduced.In [15] Leonard asked an opposite question: find all maximal proper subgroups to which G n can be reduced. He solved it in the cases when G is a reducible maximal subgroup of G n . Moreover, he proved that G n cannot be reduced to any proper subgroup (G, ρ) if (1) n is even and G n = SO(n) or SU(n), unless G n = SO(6) and G = SU(3);(2) n ≡ 11 mod 12 and G n = Sp(n);(3) G is a non-simple irreducible maximal proper subgroup of G n . 793 can be reduced to G via a homomorphism ρ : G → G n if and only if one of the following cases occurs: (A) G n = SO(n), G = SO(k), n = m − 1, m ≡ 0 mod a(m − k) and, up to conjugation, ρ is the standard inclusion SO(k) → SO(n); (B) G n = SO(n), G = SU(k), n = 2m − 1, m ≡ 0 mod 2 ν2(b(m−k)) and, up to conjugation, ρ is the composition of the standard inclusions SU(k) → SO(2k) → SO(n) or the composition SU(4) → SO(8) × SO(6) → SO(15) where the first homomorphism is given on the first factor by the standard inclusion and on the second factor by the double covering SU(4) ∼ = Spin(6) → SO(6); (C) G n = SO(n), G = Sp(k), n = 4m − 1, m ≡ 0 mod 2 ν2(c(m−k)) and, up to conjugation, ρ is the composition of the standard inclusions Sp(k) → SO(4k) → SO(n) or the exterior square Sp(3) → SO(15); (D) G n = SU(n), G = SU(k), n = m − 1, m ≡ 0 mod b(m − k) and, up to conjugation, ρ is the standard inclusion SU(k) → SU(n); (E) G n = SU(n), G = Sp(k), n = 2m − 1, m ≡ 0 mod c(m − k) and, up to conjugation, ρ is the composition of the standard inclusions Sp(k) → SU(2k) → SU(n); (F) G n = Sp(n), G = Sp(k), n = m − 1, m ≡ 0 mod c(m − k) and, up to conjugation, ρ is the standard inclusion Sp(k) → Sp(n).As a consequence of Theorem 2.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Classical computations in [1,3,5,23] showed that t(r) = a(r), b(r) and c(r) in the real, complex and quaternionic cases, respectively. Classical computations in [1,3,5,23] showed that t(r) = a(r), b(r) and c(r) in the real, complex and quaternionic cases, respectively.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

$G$-Structures on Spheres

Čadek

Crabb

2006

Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Let c F k be the F-James number computed by Adams [1] for F = R, by Adams and Walker [2] for F = C, and by Sigrist and Suter [13] for F = H. The key result of this paper is the following desuspension lemma which was unnoticed by Namboodiri [9] and Önder [11].…”

Section: Lemma 4 If ρ Has a G-section Then S(m) G S(m ⊗ F ξ K−1 ) Tmentioning

confidence: 90%

“…Let F be one of the classical division algebras over R, namely, the real numbers R, the complex numbers C, or the quaternionic numbers H. Let G be a compact Lie group, M be a finite-dimensional right F-representation space of G with a G-equivariant F-inner [1] in 1962 for the real case, by Adams and Walker [2] in 1965 for the complex case, and by Sigrist and Suter [13] …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Real, complex and quaternionic equivariant vector fields on spheres

Obiedat

2006

Topology and its Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The equivariant real, complex and quaternionic vector fields on spheres problem is reduced to a question about the equivariant J -groups of the projective spaces. As an application of this reduction, we give a generalization of the results of Namboodiri [U. Namboodiri, Equivariant vector fields on spheres, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 278 (2) (1983) 431-460], on equivariant real vector fields, and Ön-der [T. Önder, Equivariant cross sections of complex Stiefel manifolds, Topology Appl. 109 (2001) 107-125], on equivariant complex vector fields, which avoids the restriction that the representation containing the sphere has enough orbit types.

show abstract

On the groupsJ(ℂℙ m ) andJ(ℍℙ n )

Suter

1974

Bol. Soc. Bras. Mat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cross-sections of symplectic Stiefel manifolds

Abstract: The cross-section problem for the symplectic Stiefel manifolds is solved, using the now-proved Adams conjecture.

Cited by 19 publications

References 12 publications

$G$-Structures on Spheres

$G$-Structures on Spheres

Real, complex and quaternionic equivariant vector fields on spheres

On the groupsJ(ℂℙ m ) andJ(ℍℙ n )

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About