1978
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.18.1185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross sections in theCo59(n, n

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
3
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are shown in Tables 1 and 2. There is very good agreement on the values of the branching ratios observed with that obtained by Le Claire et al [7] except for the 2,823 level and minor discrepancies for the 1,434keV, 2,204keV and 3,016 keV levels. The only uncertainty in the position of levels below 3 MeV seems to be around 2,820keV where either 3 levels (2,816; 2,823; 2,829keV) or 2 levels seem to exist.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results are shown in Tables 1 and 2. There is very good agreement on the values of the branching ratios observed with that obtained by Le Claire et al [7] except for the 2,823 level and minor discrepancies for the 1,434keV, 2,204keV and 3,016 keV levels. The only uncertainty in the position of levels below 3 MeV seems to be around 2,820keV where either 3 levels (2,816; 2,823; 2,829keV) or 2 levels seem to exist.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This result is supported by quite a number of more recent determinations [,Refs. 33,6,7,39,40]. No Doppler shift could be observed for this level, in accordance with Nordhagen et al [33], the result of Swarm [20] and the B(E2)T value obtained by Gal'Perin et al [11].…”
Section: ) the 1099 Kev Levelsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations