1979
DOI: 10.1016/0146-5724(79)90061-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross sections for the formation of 114mIn and 116mIn on bombardment of cadmium by deuterons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Padalko's data agree very well with our experimental data, but Zarubin's points are too scattered. Results of Nassiff et al [14] measured on natural cadmium are higher than ours. The model calculation presents the total production cross section for all states of 116 In and has to be considered as an upper limit.…”
Section: Cross Sections Of Residual Radioisotopes Of Indiumcontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Padalko's data agree very well with our experimental data, but Zarubin's points are too scattered. Results of Nassiff et al [14] measured on natural cadmium are higher than ours. The model calculation presents the total production cross section for all states of 116 In and has to be considered as an upper limit.…”
Section: Cross Sections Of Residual Radioisotopes Of Indiumcontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…9. Cross sections of Nassiff et al [14] are lower below and higher above 18 MeV than ours but the maximum is around 15 MeV in both cases. The excitation function measured by Mirzaei et al [17] seems to be shifted along the energy axis and compressed by a factor of two along the cross section axis compared to Nassiff's and our data.…”
Section: Cross Sections Of Residual Radioisotopes Of Indiumcontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 the production cross-section for 114m In measured on nat Cd was normalized to the isotopic abundance of 114 Cd, neglecting the nearly 20 times lower contribution from 113 Cd. We applied the same normalization on the earlier reported data on nat Cd by Nassiff et al [21] and Merzaei et al [22]. According to the Fig.…”
Section: Nat Cd(d Xn) 114m In Processmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The data of Mirzaei [56] were deselected. The absolute cross-section values are too small comparing to Tárkányi [65] and to Nassiff [63]. The absolute cross-section values are also too small for the simultaneously measured 111 In.…”
Section: Cd(d2n) 114m In Reactionmentioning
confidence: 83%