2005
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.71.032705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross sections for charge-changing processes involving kilo-electron-volt H andH+with CO andCO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiplying this ratio by the charge exchange efficiency of the solar wind with planetary hydrogen upstream from the bow shock should then provide the ratio between penetrating and solar wind proton flux. Figure 3 shows that the ratio of stripping to charge exchange from laboratory measurements [Van Zyl et al, 1978;Lindsay et al, 2005;Kallio and Barabash, 2001], multiplied by a nominal 3% upstream charge exchange efficiency appropriate for solar minimum [Kallio et al, 1997], matches the observed trend. However, the data show a somewhat steeper drop in penetrating fluxes at low energy than this simple model.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution and Solar Wind Control Of Hydrogen Deposupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiplying this ratio by the charge exchange efficiency of the solar wind with planetary hydrogen upstream from the bow shock should then provide the ratio between penetrating and solar wind proton flux. Figure 3 shows that the ratio of stripping to charge exchange from laboratory measurements [Van Zyl et al, 1978;Lindsay et al, 2005;Kallio and Barabash, 2001], multiplied by a nominal 3% upstream charge exchange efficiency appropriate for solar minimum [Kallio et al, 1997], matches the observed trend. However, the data show a somewhat steeper drop in penetrating fluxes at low energy than this simple model.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution and Solar Wind Control Of Hydrogen Deposupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The observed ratio of H À to H + abundances, on the order of 1:10, suggests a similar ratio for the electron attachment and stripping cross sections (the relevant charge exchange back reactions will of course also play a role in the equilibrium fractionation). Laboratory data indeed indicate a ratio on the order of 1:10 between electron capture and electron loss cross sections for 1 keV hydrogen in CO 2 [Lindsay et al, 2005] and a ratio of 1:10 to 1:20 over a broader range of energy for N 2 and O 2 [Van Zyl et al, 1978], often used as proxies for CO 2 [Kallio and Barabash, 2001].…”
Section: Relative Charge State Abundances Of Penetrating Solar Wind Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[] and Lindsay et al . [], we expect an equilibrium charged fraction Feq+ of ~4–15% for typical solar wind speeds, with higher charged fraction for larger speed. The neutral column density required for convergence is ~1/( σ 01 + σ 10 ) or ~10 15 cm −2 for typical solar wind speed.…”
Section: Precipitating Hydrogen Observationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…After examining our data, we find that profiles measured at higher altitudes do indeed have a higher background on average than those collected deeper in the ionosphere of Mars, which may be contributing to the behavior we see in panel c of Figure 6. We do not believe that the discrepancy between the theoretical and observed value is due to any errors in the cross sections calculated by Van Zyl et al (1978) and Lindsay et al (2005), but rather due to a data processing issue or unknown physical process. It is unclear why the penetrating protons seem to take such a long time to reach this equilibrium fraction.…”
Section: Column Densitymentioning
confidence: 74%