1976
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(76)90427-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross sections and charged multiplicity distributions for π−p and K−p interactions at 147 GeV/c

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equation was motivated by the expression used for the MLLA predictions of the spectra in ref. [5]. Figure 1 shows the skewness of the ln(1/x p ) spectra as a function of ln(Q).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The equation was motivated by the expression used for the MLLA predictions of the spectra in ref. [5]. Figure 1 shows the skewness of the ln(1/x p ) spectra as a function of ln(Q).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the direction of this struck quark the scaled momentum spectra of the particles, expressed in terms of x p = 2p Breit /Q, are expected to have a dependence on Q similar to that observed in e + e − annihilation [2,3,4] at energy √ s = Q. Within the modified leading log approximation (MLLA) there are predictions of how the higher order moments of the parton momentum spectra should evolve with energy scale [5,6]. The parton level predictions depend on two free parameters, a running strong coupling, governed by a QCD scale Λ, and an energy cut-off, Q 0 , below which the parton evolution is truncated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The average charged particle multiplicity of events in this experiment is 7.4 ± 0.04 (topological cross sections and moments are discussed in Ref. 6). In order to have as complete and accurate a sample as pas-sible for events of all multiplicities, we report here on a subsample of about 1/4 of the data (""" 1600 inelastic events in the fiducial volume) for which every event failing to yield a satisfactory Keorpetric reconstruction for all tracks in the first measurement has been exanlined and remeasured.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%