2021
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.630231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Sectional Survey of Clinical Trials of Stem Cell Therapy for Heart Disease Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov

Abstract: Objective: It is important to register clinical trials before their implementation. There is a lack of study to evaluate registered clinical trials of stem cell therapy for heart diseases. Our study used the registration information at ClinicalTrials.gov to provide an overview of the registered trials investigating stem cell therapy for heart diseases.Methods: We searched ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to October 1, 2020 to identify clinical trials evaluating stem cell therapy for heart diseases. These tria… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study had several limitations that need to be acknowledged. Firstly, the scope of the analysis was restricted to clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, which may not include all clinical trials, as some investigators or sponsors may register their studies in other databases (Yang et al, 2021). Secondly, the study only provided an overview of the registered trials' characteristics and did not assess the actual strengths and weaknesses of the clinical studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study had several limitations that need to be acknowledged. Firstly, the scope of the analysis was restricted to clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, which may not include all clinical trials, as some investigators or sponsors may register their studies in other databases (Yang et al, 2021). Secondly, the study only provided an overview of the registered trials' characteristics and did not assess the actual strengths and weaknesses of the clinical studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%