2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-sectional study on the occurrence of Frey's syndrome following superficial parotidectomy or extracapsular dissection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rates of gustatory sweating following parotidectomy vary considerably in the literature, with high rates noted with the utilization of formal starch testing 37‐39 . Symptomatic Frey's syndrome is a much rarer occurrence with studies demonstrating rates from 1% to 9% 23,40 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rates of gustatory sweating following parotidectomy vary considerably in the literature, with high rates noted with the utilization of formal starch testing 37‐39 . Symptomatic Frey's syndrome is a much rarer occurrence with studies demonstrating rates from 1% to 9% 23,40 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rates of gustatory sweating following parotidectomy vary considerably in the literature, with high rates noted with the utilization of formal starch testing. [37][38][39] Symptomatic Frey's syndrome is a much rarer occurrence with studies demonstrating rates from 1% to 9%. 23,40 The low rate of symptomatic Frey's Syndrome noted at follow-up visits (1.5%) in this series is consistent with other large series demonstrating this infrequent event.…”
Section: Management Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One RCT 31 was assessed as a low risk of bias. Twenty-five studies 12,14,19,32,35,36,[38][39][40]42,44,47,49,[51][52][53][56][57][58]60,[63][64][65]68,69,71 were assessed as having moderate risk of bias, whereas the other 18 studies 14,[33][34]41,43,45,46,48,50,54,55,59,61,62,66,67,70,72 were assessed as having high risk of bias (Table S4). [32][33][34]36,40,44,…”
Section: Risk Of Bias Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…versus ECD was reported in 18 studies, 32,36,39,40,44,47,48,50,52,53,[57][58][59]62,64,65,68,71 of them 3 studies 64,65,71 reported 0 event in both groups and were excluded from the meta-analysis. The pairwise metaanalysis of the remaining 15 studies with a total of 3211 participants showed a significant higher incidence in FS T A B L E 2 Summary of incidence rates of postoperative complication of different surgical intervention of parotid gland when SP was compared to ECD and PSP (p = 0.002 and p = 0.004) (Table 1 and Figure S1).…”
Section: Spmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation