2018
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-sectional epidemiology of hearing loss in Australian children aged 11–12 years old and 25-year secular trends

Abstract: Childhood hearing loss is prevalent and has risen since 1990. Future research should investigate the causes, course and impact of these changes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Inclusion of more disadvantaged families might have reduced mean language scores somewhat, although applying study weights should have partly mitigated this; it is difficult to predict what effect this might have on concordance values. Some participants were tested before we acquired soundproof booths, which could have yielded slightly higher (worse) hearing thresholds, although we saw no evidence of this 41. Time constraints required omitting the intra-octave 3 and 6 kHz (whose thresholds are typically intermediate to those of the two bounding octave frequencies42) and 0.5 kHz (both the least relevant to spoken speech and the most affected by residual background noise) frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Inclusion of more disadvantaged families might have reduced mean language scores somewhat, although applying study weights should have partly mitigated this; it is difficult to predict what effect this might have on concordance values. Some participants were tested before we acquired soundproof booths, which could have yielded slightly higher (worse) hearing thresholds, although we saw no evidence of this 41. Time constraints required omitting the intra-octave 3 and 6 kHz (whose thresholds are typically intermediate to those of the two bounding octave frequencies42) and 0.5 kHz (both the least relevant to spoken speech and the most affected by residual background noise) frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…H earing loss among children is prevalent, with recent population-based studies reporting increased puretone hearing thresholds among 15.2% to 22.6% of school-aged children. [1][2][3] These figures comprise mainly slight hearing loss at the 16-dB to 25-dB hearing level (HL), which often is not acknowledged as clinically relevant. In practice, relevant hearing loss is usually defined as hearing loss of mild or worse degree, starting from a hearing threshold of 26-dB to 40-dB HL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the population-level impact of slight/mild hearing loss in children is important. One major reason is that hearing loss of slight/mild degree (16–40 decibels hearing loss (dB HL)) is very common, with 9.3% and 13.3% of children aged 11–12 years having bilateral and unilateral speech frequency slight/mild losses, respectively 1. Moreover, the prevalence seems to be increasing over time 1 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major reason is that hearing loss of slight/mild degree (16–40 decibels hearing loss (dB HL)) is very common, with 9.3% and 13.3% of children aged 11–12 years having bilateral and unilateral speech frequency slight/mild losses, respectively 1. Moreover, the prevalence seems to be increasing over time 1 2. Universal newborn hearing screening programmes are now widely implemented with the goal of early treatment of moderate to profound hearing loss (>40 dB HL), a level of hearing loss that has major negative impacts on child outcomes (eg, speech and language, academic performance, social interaction and isolation, behaviour and health-related quality of life (HRQL)) 3–5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%