2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4076(99)00040-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-sectional aggregation of non-linear models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, even under very stringent conditions, recovering the farm-level parameters using a county-level regression would require the inclusion of squares and cross-products of the explanatory variables and very complex functional forms (Van Garderen et al [2000] provide a few examples). Given that most Ricardian analyses have been implemented on aggregated data, it is important to investigate the size of any bias inherent in such approaches and its implication for the prediction of climate change impacts.…”
Section: Testing For Aggregation Bias and Omitted Nonlinearitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, even under very stringent conditions, recovering the farm-level parameters using a county-level regression would require the inclusion of squares and cross-products of the explanatory variables and very complex functional forms (Van Garderen et al [2000] provide a few examples). Given that most Ricardian analyses have been implemented on aggregated data, it is important to investigate the size of any bias inherent in such approaches and its implication for the prediction of climate change impacts.…”
Section: Testing For Aggregation Bias and Omitted Nonlinearitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in linear models this issue can be resolved by using appropriate weights, in nonlinear specifications the aggregation process typically produces biased coefficients and predictions (Lewbel 1991;Garderen, Lee, and Pesaran 2000;Imbs et al 2005). As Ricardian analyses typically use aggregated information and report strong nonlinear climatic effects, it is of interest to test whether these results are robust to aggregation bias.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contributions to the theoretical literature on aggregation versus disaggregation in forecasting can be found in e.g. Grunfeld & Griliches (1960), Kohn (1982), Lütkepohl (1984Lütkepohl ( , 1987, Granger (1987), Pesaran, Pierse & Kumar (1989), Garderen, Lee & Pesaran (2000), Giacomini & Granger (2004); see Lütkepohl (2006) for a recent review on aggregation and forecasting. Since in practice the DGP is not known, it is largely an empirical question whether aggregating forecasts of disaggregates improves forecast accuracy of the aggregate of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has to be kept in mind that a macro interpretation of micro hysteresis and of uncertainty impacts on &investment' decisions cannot be performed in a straightforward way because heterogeneous "rms are characterized by di!erent &investment' thresholds [8]. Thus, any assessment of the persistent e!ects of temporary exchange rate shocks on total economy employment should be founded on an adequate aggregation approach for heterogeneous ,rms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%